2015
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.55.015502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiphase structures in a periodically inverted GaAs/AlGaAs waveguide investigated by transmission electron microscopy

Abstract: We have performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation of antiphase structures in a periodically inverted GaAs/Al 0.1 Ga 0.9 As waveguide fabricated on a (100) GaAs substrate intentionally misoriented toward ½0 11 by 2°. We have unambiguously confirmed that the artificial (011) boundaries between the inverted and noninverted domains are of antiphase nature by TEM observations including conventional dark-field imaging and a two-beam technique. We also investigated unintentionally formed self-annih… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we note that the antiphase nature (or 90°rotation between the inverted and noninverted domains) of QPM devices fabricated by SRE has been confirmed on the basis of various experimental results. [15][16][17][18]25) Therefore, the unidentified lines in the inverted domains are inferred as 90°rotated (111)A and ð1 1 1ÞA twin planes observed in the noninverted domains. The observation of contrast fringes indicates that the unidentified lines are due to the twin structures in the inverted domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here, we note that the antiphase nature (or 90°rotation between the inverted and noninverted domains) of QPM devices fabricated by SRE has been confirmed on the basis of various experimental results. [15][16][17][18]25) Therefore, the unidentified lines in the inverted domains are inferred as 90°rotated (111)A and ð1 1 1ÞA twin planes observed in the noninverted domains. The observation of contrast fringes indicates that the unidentified lines are due to the twin structures in the inverted domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%