2013
DOI: 10.3390/molecules19010438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant Properties and Hyphenated HPLC-PDA-MS Profiling of Chilean Pica Mango Fruits (Mangifera indica L. Cv. piqueño)

Abstract: Antioxidant capacities and polyphenolic contents of two mango cultivars from northern Chile, one of them endemic of an oasis in the Atacama Desert, were compared for the first time. Twenty one phenolic compounds were detected in peel and pulp of mango fruits varieties Pica and Tommy Atkins by HPLC-PDA-MS and tentatively characterized. Eighteen compounds were present in Pica pulp (ppu), 13 in Pica peel (ppe) 11 in Tommy Atkins pulp (tpu) and 12 in Tommy Atkins peel (tpe). Three procyanidin dimers (peaks 6, 9 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
53
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
53
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak 5, with a molecular ion at m / z 559 ( λ max 296), has been previously reported in M. indica var. Tommy Atkins pulp and was identified as a procyanidin A dimer with an epiafzelechin monomer constituent (epiafzelechin‐epicatechin dimer) . Peak 9 was only detected in the MBE from Tommy Atkins, with a molecular ion at m / z 527, and it was identified as iriflophenone 3‐ C ‐(2‐ O ‐galloyl)‐ β ‐ d ‐glucoside ( λ max 266), as reported previously .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Peak 5, with a molecular ion at m / z 559 ( λ max 296), has been previously reported in M. indica var. Tommy Atkins pulp and was identified as a procyanidin A dimer with an epiafzelechin monomer constituent (epiafzelechin‐epicatechin dimer) . Peak 9 was only detected in the MBE from Tommy Atkins, with a molecular ion at m / z 527, and it was identified as iriflophenone 3‐ C ‐(2‐ O ‐galloyl)‐ β ‐ d ‐glucoside ( λ max 266), as reported previously .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Tommy Atkins pulp and was identified as a procyanidin A dimer with an epiafzelechin monomer constituent (epiafzelechin-epicatechin dimer). 24 Peak 9 was only detected in the MBE from Tommy Atkins, with a molecular ion at m/z 527, and it was identified as iriflophenone 3-C-(2-O-galloyl)--D-glucoside ( max 266), as reported previously. 3 ( max 265), and it was identified as methyl gallate according to a previous report.…”
Section: Identification and Quantification Of Phenolic Constituentssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result was similar to the result (11.68 mg GAE/g) obtained by Tunchaiyaphum et al (2013). The value obtained in this present study was higher than the previous values reported for different varieties of mango peels; 45.25 -87.67 mg GAE/100g (Imran et al, 2013;Ramirez, Zambrano, Sepulveda, & Simirgiotis, 2014) and 0.86 g GAE/100g (De Almeida Monaco et al, 2014). However, this value is lower than that reported by Nixwell, Johanna, and Ngezimana (2013) at 2.4 mg/100mg for the average of six mango cultivars and Ajila et al (2007) at 55 to 110 mg/g dry peel for two Indian mango varieties.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The flavonoid content of the peel of mango fruit as presented in Table 1 shows that the mango peel of freshly harvested mango fruit has a flavonoid content of 3.58 mg Quercetin Equivalent (QE)/g. The flavonoid content in the present study was similar to the value reported for mango peel using a polar extraction method (Toledo-Guillen, Higuera-Ciapara, Garcia-Navarrete, & de la Fuente, 2010; Garcia, Cabral, & Martinez-Correa, 2013), higher than that reported by earlier researchers for different mango peel varieties (Ramirez et al, 2014;De Almeida Monaco et al, 2014) but lower than the 11.73 QE mg/g reported by Nisha and Bhatnagar (2014). The value of the flavonoid of the peel of mango fruit stored at refrigeration temperature (3.58 mg QE/g) was not significantly different from the peel of freshly harvested mango fruit.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 35%