Antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review

Abstract

Objectives. To examine published antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives in hospitals in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) in order to characterize AMS terminology usage, geotemporality, and elements of structure (human resources), process (interventions), and outcomes, and to set priority areas for improving AMS reporting. Methods. This was a scoping review that searched PubMed, LILACS, EMBASE, and 12 other databases, along with a manual search for academic and grey literature to identify documents on AMS initiatives in hospitals in 33 countries of LAC, up to August 2019. Keywords included ‘antibiotic’ or ‘antimicrobial’ AND ‘stewardship, policy, strategies, management, control, rational use, appropriate use, surveillance, or interventions’ and 33 country names. Results. Selected articles totalled 147 studies published in 1985 – 2019; of those, 22% used ‘antimicrobial stewardship’ in the title. Eighteen countries published AMS hospital initiatives, one-half of which were implemented in capital cities. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and Chile, in descending frequency, made up > 59% of published initiatives. Educational interventions were the most frequently reported, followed by persuasive and restrictive strategies. Antimicrobial consumption was the most common outcome measure reported. About one-third of the studies (35%) referred to baseline measures-only in preparation for AMS interventions. Fifty-nine studies from 6 countries reported AMS comprehensively, using structure, process, and outcome (SPO) elements. Conclusions. Published hospital AMS initiatives have increased over time and have expanded across LAC. However, more programs need to be developed. Complete reporting of SPO elements is imperative to evaluating and replicating AMS actions.

Point prevalence survey of antibiotic use in hospitals in Latin American countries

“…A recently published scoping review on ASPs in Latin America showed that although utilization of antimicrobials was the most frequently reported outcome, most studies had been done by measuring DDDs and only a few through a PPS. 15 During recent years, multicountry studies, such as the Global-PPS of antimicrobial consumption, 5 which included 4122 patients from 21 hospitals in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Brazil, and a PPS on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial consumption including 2740 patients from 11 hospitals from four Latin American countries—Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela—were conducted. 16 …”

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes in Saudi Hospitals: Evidence from a National Survey

“…Elsewhere, despite the repetitive calls for better antimicrobial stewardship, the adoption of ASPs is still lagging behind, particularly in regions with a high burden of antimicrobial resistance, such as the Middle East [ 6 , 20 ]. Latin America [ 21 ], and Sub-Saharan Africa [ 22 ].…”

Antimicrobial Stewardship: Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting Global Public Health

“… 240 , 248 , 249 The ASPs are widely recognized as competent planning and policy implementation mechanisms to battle AMR’s mounting threat. 79 , 250 , 251 There is also the widespread belief that antimicrobial stewardship is a team’s determination to comprise all healthcare workers in the continuum of care. ASPs may vary by healthcare institutions; therefore, flexible and tailored approaches to local needs are essential.…”