2015
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Resistance in Wildlife: Implications for Public Health

Abstract: The emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in natural environments is a major concern with serious implications for human and animal health. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of AMR Escherichia coli (E. coli) in wild birds and mammalian species. Thirty faecal samples were collected from each of the following wildlife species: herring gulls (Larus argentatus), black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus), lesser black-back gulls (Larus fuscus), hybrid deer species (Cervus el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
84
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
5
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, recoveries of ESBL producers from wildlife such as birds [212][213][214] , boars and Barbary macaques 215) , red deer and wild small mammals 216) , and raccoon 217,218) have been increasingly documented from many countries. The wildlife colonized by ESBL producers would work as incubators and reservoirs of antimicrobialresistant microbes including ESBL producers in the environments surrounding the human community, and this would become one of the human public health concerns 219) . The ESBL producers in the feces of wildlife would indeed contrarily pollute the river water, drinking water, vegetables, and livestock, and this would subsequently augment the fecal carriage of ESBL producers in companion animals and ordinary citizens as a result of environmental circulation of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.…”
Section: Emission Of Esbl Producers Into the Environment And Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recoveries of ESBL producers from wildlife such as birds [212][213][214] , boars and Barbary macaques 215) , red deer and wild small mammals 216) , and raccoon 217,218) have been increasingly documented from many countries. The wildlife colonized by ESBL producers would work as incubators and reservoirs of antimicrobialresistant microbes including ESBL producers in the environments surrounding the human community, and this would become one of the human public health concerns 219) . The ESBL producers in the feces of wildlife would indeed contrarily pollute the river water, drinking water, vegetables, and livestock, and this would subsequently augment the fecal carriage of ESBL producers in companion animals and ordinary citizens as a result of environmental circulation of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.…”
Section: Emission Of Esbl Producers Into the Environment And Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition of the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) can be considered a natural phenomenon as a result of evolution, although it can be quickened by human influence [2]. Indeed, AMR can be seen as a direct consequence of the misuse of antibiotics, in healthcare, veterinary, agriculture and aquaculture, inexorably leading to the acquirement of antibiotic-resistant traits by microorganisms [3]. Wastewater from agriculture, hospitals, farms or urban wastewater treatment plants could contain resistant bacteria, which, due to either seepage phenomena or sewage from fertilized soils, can contribute to contaminating environments, where ARGs can be transferred to environmental bacteria through the well-known horizontal gene transfer mechanisms [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last century, the abuse and misuse of antibiotics led to the alarming emergence of antibacterial-resistant (ABR) strains that represent an increasing threat for both human and animal health worldwide [1][2][3]. In recent years, the spread of ABR strains has been frequently reported in natural environments, i.e., wild animals, soils, seawater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%