2011
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01111-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Resistance in Generic Escherichia coli Isolates from Wild Small Mammals Living in Swine Farm, Residential, Landfill, and Natural Environments in Southern Ontario, Canada

Abstract: To assess the impacts of different types of human activity on the development of resistant bacteria in the feces of wild small mammals, we compared the prevalences and patterns of antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in generic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolates from fecal samples collected from wild small mammals living in four environments: swine farms, residential areas, landfills, and natural habitats. Resistance to antimicrobials was observed in E. coli isolates from animals in all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
76
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are consistent with previous studies looking at the prevalences of AMR in wildlife in Ontario and around the world (5% to 48% in Ontario, Canada [2,12], 13.7% in the Czech Republic [14], and 20.1% in the United Kingdom [28]). We found that the prevalence of AMR in fecal E. coli isolates from raccoons in rural areas was lower than what has been reported for small mammals (e.g., mice, rats, and chipmunks) living on swine farms (48%) and in contrast with previous studies, and we detected no significant difference in the prevalences of resistance between urban and rural environments (2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These values are consistent with previous studies looking at the prevalences of AMR in wildlife in Ontario and around the world (5% to 48% in Ontario, Canada [2,12], 13.7% in the Czech Republic [14], and 20.1% in the United Kingdom [28]). We found that the prevalence of AMR in fecal E. coli isolates from raccoons in rural areas was lower than what has been reported for small mammals (e.g., mice, rats, and chipmunks) living on swine farms (48%) and in contrast with previous studies, and we detected no significant difference in the prevalences of resistance between urban and rural environments (2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Small wild mammals, such as mice and voles, are often targeted for studies investigating the impact of human activity on the development of antimicrobial resistance the environment and associated wildlife (2,8,12); however, because of the limited home range of these species, they are unlikely to be involved in the widespread dissemination of resistant bacteria. For this study, we targeted raccoons (Procyon lotor), which are common, midsized mammals that live in close association with humans in both urban and agricultural areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Similar reports of high levels of resistance to antimicrobials exist. 1,27,37 The findings of the present study suggest that, on the properties sampled, there may not have been selective pressure caused by antibiotic use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The prevalence of ampicillin resistance among E. coli isolates from bank voles and wood mice from forest sites in England was also very high (90.0%) (36). Furthermore, in a Canadian study, the prevalence of ampicillin resistance was higher among wild mammals trapped in a natural environment than among those trapped on swine farms (8.0% versus 2.0%, respectively) (31). Further molecular studies are needed to elucidate the molecular basis of this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%