2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09782-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Polymers for Anti-biofilm Medical Devices: State-of-Art and Perspectives

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…made over the years to improve the bacterial fouling resistance of polyurethanes, in order to reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections [8]. Traditionally, antimicrobial or antifouling polyurethanes were obtained by the adsorption/conjugation of drugs or antiseptics [9][10][11][12][13]. More recently, research efforts have been focused on either the use of natural compounds with anti-biofilm properties [14][15][16][17], or on the development of intrinsically antimicrobial and antifouling materials, by either physical or chemical technological approaches [17][18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…made over the years to improve the bacterial fouling resistance of polyurethanes, in order to reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections [8]. Traditionally, antimicrobial or antifouling polyurethanes were obtained by the adsorption/conjugation of drugs or antiseptics [9][10][11][12][13]. More recently, research efforts have been focused on either the use of natural compounds with anti-biofilm properties [14][15][16][17], or on the development of intrinsically antimicrobial and antifouling materials, by either physical or chemical technological approaches [17][18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although passive surfaces repel bacteria, they do not actively interact with or kill bacteria. Due to the mainly hydrophobic and negatively-charged properties of microbes, passive polymers should be either (1) hydrophilic; (2) negatively-charged; or (3) have a low surface free energy ( Figure 1 ) [ 8 , 30 ]. Typical passive polymers comprise (1) self-healing, slippery liquid-infused porous surface (SLIPS), such as poly(dimethyl siloxane); (2) uncharged polymers, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline), polypeptoid, polypoly( n -vinyl-pyrrolidone), and poly(dimethyl acrylamide); and (3) charged polyampholytes and zwitterionic polymers, such as phosphobetaine, sulfobetaine, and phospholipid polymers [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Passive or Active Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different factors, such us microbial contamination of the wound bed and oxidative stress at the wound level as a consequence of diseases (diabetes and cardiovascular diseases), can slow down or hamper tissue regeneration processes (chronic wounds) [7]. There is, therefore, a clinical demand to develop novel antimicrobial materials [8,9] that, besides physically protecting the wound, could protect also from infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%