2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of propolis from Croatia and Brazil: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It estimates the ability of a substance, or an extract which contains it, to donate a proton, and thus cause the transformation of free radicals into a less reactive species. Interestingly, some previous findings indicated that ethanolic propolis extracts were superior reducers and inhibitors of β-carotene degradation [14]. In this study, however, WSDP was more successful inhibitor of β-carotene bleaching than EEP, while the reducing powers of the two extracts were equal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It estimates the ability of a substance, or an extract which contains it, to donate a proton, and thus cause the transformation of free radicals into a less reactive species. Interestingly, some previous findings indicated that ethanolic propolis extracts were superior reducers and inhibitors of β-carotene degradation [14]. In this study, however, WSDP was more successful inhibitor of β-carotene bleaching than EEP, while the reducing powers of the two extracts were equal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This is in accordance with some previous studies which showed a superior activity of ethanolic extract over aqueous in this assay. For example, antiradical activity of ethanolic extracts of both, poplar-type propolis from Croatia and alecrim-type Brazilian propolis, was greater than the activity of their aqueous extracts [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are presented as MIC values (Table 1), except for e. coli since no antibacterial activity could be detected and all MIC values were above 50 mg/ml. Nina et al (2015) described limited activity of propolis samples from Argentina against e. coli, while others (Boyanova et al 2006;Kosalec et al 2007) found no inhibitory activity of Bulgarian and Brazilian propolis, respectively, against e. coli. Kosalec et al (2007) found MIC values of below 10.4 mg/ml against e. coli while testing Croatian propolis samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nina et al (2015) described limited activity of propolis samples from Argentina against e. coli, while others (Boyanova et al 2006;Kosalec et al 2007) found no inhibitory activity of Bulgarian and Brazilian propolis, respectively, against e. coli. Kosalec et al (2007) found MIC values of below 10.4 mg/ml against e. coli while testing Croatian propolis samples. On the other hand, it has been shown that Brazilian and Korean propolis inhibit the Gram-negative bacterium s. typhimurium, but have no activity against P. aeruginosa (Choi et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%