1998
DOI: 10.1021/ci9702454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Activity Characterization in a Heterogeneous Group of Compounds

Abstract: In this work we carry out a study of pattern recognition to detect the microbiological activity in a group of heterogeneous compounds. The structural descriptors utilized are the topological connectivity indexes. The methods followed are stepwise linear discriminant analysis (linear analysis) and artificial neural network (nonlinear analysis). Although both methods are appropriate to differentiate between active and inactive compounds, the artificial neural network is, in this case, more adequate, since it sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest series of QSAR works report effective separation of bioactive substances from the non-active chemicals by applying the methods of Support Vector Machines (SVM) [17,18], probability-based classification [19], the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [20][21][22] and the Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) [23,24] among others. Several groups used datasets of antibacterial compounds to build the binary classifiers of general antibacterial activity (antibiotic-likeness models) utilizing the ANN algorithm [25][26][27], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [28,29], binary logistic regression [29] or k-means cluster method [30]. Thus, in the study [31] the LDA has been used to relate anti-malarial activity of a series of chemical compounds to molecular connectivity QSAR indices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest series of QSAR works report effective separation of bioactive substances from the non-active chemicals by applying the methods of Support Vector Machines (SVM) [17,18], probability-based classification [19], the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [20][21][22] and the Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) [23,24] among others. Several groups used datasets of antibacterial compounds to build the binary classifiers of general antibacterial activity (antibiotic-likeness models) utilizing the ANN algorithm [25][26][27], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [28,29], binary logistic regression [29] or k-means cluster method [30]. Thus, in the study [31] the LDA has been used to relate anti-malarial activity of a series of chemical compounds to molecular connectivity QSAR indices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These QSAR approaches process a variety of structure-dependent descriptors with machine learning and statistical techniques such as Artificial Neural Networks [1][2][3], Linear Discriminant Analysis, [4][5][6] Binary Logistic Regression [5], Principal Component Analysis and k-means Cluster method [7]. In some cases the results allowed the authors to introduce novel anti-infective leads, however, all of the reported QSAR solutions have been built upon already well -studied classes of traditional antibiotics.…”
Section: Qsar Models For Antibiotic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the value for the Matthew s indicates an appropriate agreement between the assignments and the predictions from the model established [70]. Finally, the high value of 1 ¼ 9.0 shows that the model is not overfitted by an excess of parameters; this parameter is expected to be > 4 for linear models [69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, we controlled the Matthew s coefficient (C ¼ 0.698) [68] and the cases/adjustable parameters ratio (1 ¼ 9.0) taking into account the smallest group into the classification [69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%