a mix survived differently in individual animals and in general, the culture combination resulted in good survival and persistence, as previously observed by Pedersen et al. (1992). Many studies have reported reductions in intestinal coliform and Enterobacteriaceae due to probiotic administration; however, some have seen no effects (Simon et al., 2003). In the present study most of the cultures resulted in reductions in faecal Enterobacteriaceae; in fact, reductions of up to 98 % were observed. However, except for day 15, these reductions were not statistically significant, probably due to the variation in counts between individual animals, a common observation in probiotic animal trials. This inconsistency may be explained by individual variations in response to probiotics due to the complexity of the intestine (Simon et al., 2003). Future experiments using larger treatment groups and deliberate Salmonella infection should provide further information on the pathogen-lowering ability of these cultures.Conclusions: Pig-derived potentially probiotic cultures with anti-Salmonella activity can be effectively delivered to the porcine intestine by oral administration, either individually or as a strain combination. However, it was evident that certain cultures survived at higher levels, persisted for longer in the caecum post-administration and were more effective in reducing pathogenic indicator species, highlighting the advantages of using combination probiotics in pigs. We conclude that, although further characterisation of efficacy is necessary, the findings provide a basis to further explore the potential of these porcine isolates as microbial feed additives (most likely administered as a mixture) for Salmonella reduction in pigs.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS ORAL PRESENTATIONSTyphimurium strain with porcine peripheral blood monocytes. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by monocytes and the numbers of intracellularly killed bacteria differed significantly between the different pigs used. Opsonization of Salmonella bacteria with complement significantly decreased bacterial killing. Interestingly, monocytic ROS production was suppressed by metabolically active bacteria. In conclusion, binding to host complement and suppression of monocyte ROS production enable ser. Typhimurium to survive for at least 6 hours in porcine monocytes. Moreover, individual differences of porcine monocytes to produce ROS and to kill the intracellular Salmonella bacteria might account for the development of the carrier state in some pigs and not in others.