2004
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.6202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toll-Like Receptor 4 Dependence of Innate and Adaptive Immunity to Salmonella: Importance of the Kupffer Cell Network

Abstract: Mammalian cells recognize LPS from Gram-negative bacteria via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) complex. During experimental Salmonella infection, C3H/HeJ mice carrying a dominant-negative mutation in TLR4 exhibited delayed chemokine production, impaired NO generation, and attenuated cellular immune responses. However, dramatically enhanced bacterial growth within the Kupffer cell network before the recruitment of inflammatory cells appeared to be primarily responsible for the early demise of Salmonella-infected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
104
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(36 reference statements)
11
104
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…10,15 We were therefore interested in testing the hypothesis that increasing Tlr4 expression would also translate into improved control of bacterial growth in the Tlr4 overexpression and resistance to Salmonella M-F Roy et al spleen and liver of mice during infection. To verify this hypothesis, we measured the bacterial load in the spleen and liver of our mice at various time points following Salmonella infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,15 We were therefore interested in testing the hypothesis that increasing Tlr4 expression would also translate into improved control of bacterial growth in the Tlr4 overexpression and resistance to Salmonella M-F Roy et al spleen and liver of mice during infection. To verify this hypothesis, we measured the bacterial load in the spleen and liver of our mice at various time points following Salmonella infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate a role for the level of Tlr4 expression in controlling the bacterial replication during the first 10 days of infection. However, in F1Tg388 mice, the spleen and liver bacterial load eventually increased during the late phase of infection to reach lethal numbers around days [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Therefore, the increased protection conferred by incremental Tlr4 expression appears to be limited to the early phase of infection suggesting that despite a robust innate immune response, the host is unable to mount protective adaptive immunity resulting in long-term control of the bacterial replication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the timely development of host immune responses is critical for control of Salmonella infection. This is illustrated by the increased susceptibility of TLR4-deficient mice to Salmonella infection, in which bacterial burden increases as a result of delayed immune responses (72). It may not be necessary for a pathogen to completely abrogate host immune responses if delaying the response allows bacteria to multiply beyond the capacity of host defenses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their enhanced susceptibility to Salmonella infection and the slight delay in chemokine production in the liver of i.p.-injected mice [29][30][31], we first examined cell recruitment in TLR4 À/À mice. However, no significant difference in accumulation of CD11b 1 Ly6C hi monocytes or CD11b 1 Ly6G hi neutrophils (gated as in (Fig.…”
Section: Monocytes and Neutrophils Form Inflammatory Foci In Ppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the formation of cellular foci, which are preferentially made to prevent bacterial spread [40,41], is ensured by redundancy in the chemokine network. Thus, CCL2, CXCL2, CCL3 and CCL4 may all play a role in formation of cellular foci in Salmonella-infected tissues.Two of the most important candidates for initiating an immune response to Salmonella are TLR4 and TLR5 [29][30][31][42][43][44], which recognize LPS and flagellin, respectively [32]. Despite this, the Cells were stained with 7AAD, CD11c, MHC-II, Ly6C, Ly6G and a cocktail of anti-NK1.1, TCR-a/b and CD19 conjugated to the same fluorochrome and sorted into Ly6C hi Ly6G low monocytes and Ly6C int Ly6G hi neutrophils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%