1997
DOI: 10.1006/jssc.1997.7396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiferromagnetic Coupling in the Cyclic Octanuclear Compound [Cu(II)(μ-3,5-dimethylpyrazolate)(μ-OH)] and Its Analogue [Cu(II)(μ-pyrazolate)(μ-OH)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior may be related to an antiferromagnetic ordering due to uncompensated spin alignment. The maximum on this curve is found at T = 260 ± 6 K, which means that using a Bonner and Fisher fit would result in J < 0; the susceptibility passes through a rounded maximum at a temperature T max defined by kT max /| J | = 0.641, giving a value J = −282 ± 6 cm -1 . ,
3 Thermal dependence of the magnetization at different magnetic field intensities H . Note the change of the magnetization from low to high field.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This behavior may be related to an antiferromagnetic ordering due to uncompensated spin alignment. The maximum on this curve is found at T = 260 ± 6 K, which means that using a Bonner and Fisher fit would result in J < 0; the susceptibility passes through a rounded maximum at a temperature T max defined by kT max /| J | = 0.641, giving a value J = −282 ± 6 cm -1 . ,
3 Thermal dependence of the magnetization at different magnetic field intensities H . Note the change of the magnetization from low to high field.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%