2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18529-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in raptors from Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies elsewhere have found generally lower exposure rates and concentrations in accipiters and falcons (Hughes et al, 2013; Walker et al, 2015). A recent study from the Canadian province of Ontario reported similar results to those of the present study, with zero or low incidence of SGARs in sharp‐shinned hawks and falcons but higher incidence in Cooper's hawks (Thornton et al, 2022). However, northern goshawks collected from Berlin, Germany, had the greatest SGAR incidence and concentrations among collected species; and the authors of that study speculated that the pathway was likely via passerine birds entering bait stations (Badry et al, 2021), as reported in Walther et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Studies elsewhere have found generally lower exposure rates and concentrations in accipiters and falcons (Hughes et al, 2013; Walker et al, 2015). A recent study from the Canadian province of Ontario reported similar results to those of the present study, with zero or low incidence of SGARs in sharp‐shinned hawks and falcons but higher incidence in Cooper's hawks (Thornton et al, 2022). However, northern goshawks collected from Berlin, Germany, had the greatest SGAR incidence and concentrations among collected species; and the authors of that study speculated that the pathway was likely via passerine birds entering bait stations (Badry et al, 2021), as reported in Walther et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, our previous data suggest that in more urbanized or interface habitats, targeted rats appear to provide an important pathway of exposure in owls. Regardless of whether the pathway is via target or nontarget small mammals, AR deployment in bait stations, often permanent, is contaminating birds of prey throughout the sampled areas of western Canada and in many other parts of the world (López‐Perea & Mateo, 2018; Okoniewski et al, 2021; Rial‐Berriel et al, 2021; Serieys et al, 2019; Thornton et al, 2022). Whether target or nontarget rodents are the primary pathway is perhaps not an important question unless it is possible to design bait stations to allow targeted rats to enter but exclude nontarget small mammals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the use of ARs may be necessary for rodent control, the well-known risks of primary and secondary poisoning of non-target species necessitates debate on the need to require measures to mitigate the risks of ARs use (Buckle and Prescott, 2018;Eisemann et al, 2018;Witmer, 2018;Thornton et al, 2022). Indeed, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the CMS, or Bonn Convention) highlighted secondary exposure to ARs as one of the most important toxicological hazards for migratory birds (CMS, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%