2010
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticancer effects of CAMEL peptide

Abstract: This study analyzed whether therapy with CAMEL, an antimicrobial peptide (KWKLFKKIGAVLKVL), possess anticancer benefits. Although the peptide was cytotoxic for all the cell lines tested, it did not cause hemolysis, which suggests that CAMEL does not damage cell membranes. After cellular internalization, CAMEL localized to mitochondria and lowered the mitochondrial potential, resulting in the organelles' swelling, a decrease in cellular ATP level and, finally, cellular breakdown. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect was observed when using a combination of glycyrrhizin with CAMEL peptide, which also triggers cell necrosis (Smolarczyk et al 2010, 2012). In most likelihood tumor relapse that we observed following cessation of therapy was mediated by surviving cancer cells or CSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar effect was observed when using a combination of glycyrrhizin with CAMEL peptide, which also triggers cell necrosis (Smolarczyk et al 2010, 2012). In most likelihood tumor relapse that we observed following cessation of therapy was mediated by surviving cancer cells or CSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A similar effect was observed when combining CAMEL peptide and plasmid DNA carrying IL-12 gene, where tumors disappeared in 60 % of mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma tumors (Smolarczyk et al 2010). IL-12 combination with drugs that cause necrotic tumor cell death (CAMEL, D-K 6 L 9 ) seems to be the best therapeutic option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A 1% Triton X-100 (G-Biosciences, USA) solution in water was used as a positive control, and PBS was the negative control. The samples were centrifuged after 24 h of incubation, and supernatants were transferred into a 96-well plate to assay erythrocyte lysis at a wavelength of 405 nm (29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive control used was 1 % Triton XÀ100 (G Biosciences USA) in water and sterile PBS as a negative control. After incubation at 37 C, all treated samples were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min and supernatants were transferred to a fresh 96-well plate to examine erythrocyte lysis by spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at a wavelength of 541 nm (Smolarczyk et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%