2022
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03122-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody response to oral biofilm is a biomarker for acute coronary syndrome in periodontal disease

Abstract: Cumulative evidence over the last decades have supported the role of gum infections as a risk for future major cardiovascular events. The precise mechanism connecting coronary artery disease (CAD) with periodontal findings has remained elusive. Here, we employ next generation phage display mimotope-variation analysis (MVA) to identify the features of dysfunctional immune system that associate CAD with periodontitis. We identify a fine molecular description of the antigenic epitope repertoires of CAD and its mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of core consensus sequences was either performed discriminatorily (see below for details), where selected peptide sets were studied for enrichment compared to control group, or non-discriminatorily (see below for details), where enrichment was identified compared to a random-generated peptide set (hypothesis-free). The decision of whether to compare sample peptides to random-generated reference peptide sets or to peptides from matched controls samples was determined by the clinical question of the study 40 , 45 , 46 with parameters chosen to maximise the number of epitope consensuses in the output. In brief, for each clinical group, 100,000s of distinct peptide antigens were used as input, from which 1000s of distinct core epitopes were identified with SPEXS2 algorithm.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The identification of core consensus sequences was either performed discriminatorily (see below for details), where selected peptide sets were studied for enrichment compared to control group, or non-discriminatorily (see below for details), where enrichment was identified compared to a random-generated peptide set (hypothesis-free). The decision of whether to compare sample peptides to random-generated reference peptide sets or to peptides from matched controls samples was determined by the clinical question of the study 40 , 45 , 46 with parameters chosen to maximise the number of epitope consensuses in the output. In brief, for each clinical group, 100,000s of distinct peptide antigens were used as input, from which 1000s of distinct core epitopes were identified with SPEXS2 algorithm.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of distinct consensus epitopes (n = 8088) for CAD cohort is described in detail in 46 . The generation of distinct consensus epitopes (n = 4019) for MI cohort is in 45 .…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main etiological factor is dental plaque [7]. Clinical manifestations of the disease are determined by the nature of the immune response to microorganisms clustered in biofilm [8]. In addition to oral plaque, the onset and progression of the disease are influenced by other local and systemic factors, such as tobacco consumption, viral infections, and diabetes mellitus [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%