2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody immobilization using pneumatic spray: Comparison with the avidin–biotin bridge immobilization method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical adsorption gives low control over the orientation of the Abs, even though immobilization of Abs using a pneumatic nebulizer is fast and reproducible. 51 Zhao et al 52 studied how solution pH, salt concentration and surface chemistry affect Ab adsorption onto silica surfaces. The salt concentration and pH did inuence the amount of adsorbed Ab and analyte binding, but did not inuence the orientation of immobilized Abs.…”
Section: Non-covalent Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical adsorption gives low control over the orientation of the Abs, even though immobilization of Abs using a pneumatic nebulizer is fast and reproducible. 51 Zhao et al 52 studied how solution pH, salt concentration and surface chemistry affect Ab adsorption onto silica surfaces. The salt concentration and pH did inuence the amount of adsorbed Ab and analyte binding, but did not inuence the orientation of immobilized Abs.…”
Section: Non-covalent Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli O157:H7 using the avidin–biotin bridge method and its immobilization using pneumatic spray on modified glass slides reported no detection for a solution concentration of ∼10 5 cells/mL. This study cites 0% and 40% detection at 10 6 cells/mL, and 60% and 100% detection at 10 7 cells/mL for pneumatic spray and avidin–biotin bridge slides, respectively . Although the exact quantification was not reported, it can be concluded from their microscopy images that the density of the immobilized cells captured from 10 7 CFU/mL corresponded to ∼120 cells per 140 × 140 μm 2 area, which is slightly lower than the cell densities observed in this study350–400 cells per 140 × 200 μm 2 (Figure ) captured from a suspension of 10 7 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This study cites 0% and 40% detection at 10 6 cells/mL, and 60% and 100% detection at 10 7 cells/mL for pneumatic spray and avidin−biotin bridge slides, respectively. 30 Although the exact quantification was not reported, it can be concluded from their microscopy images that the density of the immobilized cells captured from 10 7 CFU/mL corresponded to ∼120 cells per 140 × 140 μm 2 area, which is slightly lower than the cell densities observed in this study350−400 cells per 140 × 200 μm 2 (Figure 5) captured from a suspension of 10 7 CFU/mL. When scaled, the work reported by ref 30 predicts ∼0.6 cells/10 μm 2 as compared to 1.2 cells/10 μm 2 in this work.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%