2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

48
568
2
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 585 publications
(622 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
48
568
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory studies [2][3][4][5][6] consistently suggest that antibodies triggered by vaccination are less effective at blocking BA.4 and BA.5 than they are at blocking earlier Omicron strains, including BA.1 and BA.2. This could leave even vaccinated and boosted people vulnerable to multiple Omicron infections, scientists say.…”
Section: How Well Do Vaccines Work Against the Variants?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory studies [2][3][4][5][6] consistently suggest that antibodies triggered by vaccination are less effective at blocking BA.4 and BA.5 than they are at blocking earlier Omicron strains, including BA.1 and BA.2. This could leave even vaccinated and boosted people vulnerable to multiple Omicron infections, scientists say.…”
Section: How Well Do Vaccines Work Against the Variants?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BA.5 became predominant worldwide by mid-2022 and was responsible for a surge of contaminations in many countries 16,17 . The neutralizing activity of sera from COVID-19 vaccine recipients is reduced against BA.5 by about 3-5 fold compared to BA.1 and BA.2 11,[18][19][20][21][22] . Little is known about real-world vaccine efficacy against BA.5 infections, in individuals that were or were not previously infected with BA.1 or BA.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to BA.2 spike, BA.2.12.1 contains two additional mutations (L452Q and S704L) while BA. 4 and BA.5 spikes are identical and have 4 constant alterations (Del69-70, L452R, F486V, R493Q) plus one mutation (N658S) seen in earlier sequences (Fig. 1a-1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%