2020
DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00092-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, adding prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli should be considered. 9 Other studies also support the incorporation of aminoglycosides in prophylactic protocols in these patients. 15,16 These conclusions align with the BPG statement that "patients with neuromuscular disease should receive perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli for an insertion procedure."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, adding prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli should be considered. 9 Other studies also support the incorporation of aminoglycosides in prophylactic protocols in these patients. 15,16 These conclusions align with the BPG statement that "patients with neuromuscular disease should receive perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli for an insertion procedure."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…SSI is an important and common complication after growth-friendly procedures in EOS patients. [4][5][6][7][8][9] This study analyzes antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures in EOS patients and assesses change in practice over time after BPG publication for SSI prevention. We found considerable variation in antibiotic prophylaxis for EOS patients, though there has been a significant increase in usage of intravenous cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surgery at different locations should consider covering different types of bacteria when preventing infections. A retrospective study of spinal surgery 58 included 1410 pediatric patients using cefazolin for prevention. SSIs occurred in 68 patients (4.8%), and bacterial culture was positive in 48 patients, among them, 72% were Gram‐negative bacterial infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When patients present with multiple significant risk factors for SSI, considering more comprehensive antibiotic prophylaxis may be beneficial. For example Piantoni et al26 make a case for extending prophylaxis to include coverage of gram-negative bacteria for some high-risk pediatric spinal patients, among whom these microbes may be especially common. A retrospective study of pediatric spine patients by Vandenberg et al27 demonstrated reduced rates of SSI after the implementation of an antibiotic protocol including the expansion of prophylaxis to include preoperative vancomycin for all patients 13 years or older and ceftriaxone for expanded coverage of gram-negative organisms for patients who were deemed high risk.…”
Section: Expanded Antibiotic Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%