2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008738.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Summarizing the evidence is challenging due to the diversity of the population. The quality of evidence was low for mortality in pancreatitis [122] and low for burns; therefore, we believe this recommendation is better addressed as a BPS, in which the alternative of administering antibiotics without indicators of infection is implausible [122][123][124]. Despite our recommendation against sustained systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis generally, brief antibiotic prophylaxis for specific invasive procedures may be appropriate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Summarizing the evidence is challenging due to the diversity of the population. The quality of evidence was low for mortality in pancreatitis [122] and low for burns; therefore, we believe this recommendation is better addressed as a BPS, in which the alternative of administering antibiotics without indicators of infection is implausible [122][123][124]. Despite our recommendation against sustained systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis generally, brief antibiotic prophylaxis for specific invasive procedures may be appropriate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, prolonged systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis has been used in the past for patients with severe burns. However, recent meta-analyses suggest questionable clinical benefit with this approach [123,124]. Current guidelines for burn management do not support sustained antimicrobial prophylaxis [101].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic therapy are risk factors for the development of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and infection. [5] Some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Acinetobacter now encountered in burn units are resistant to all the aforementioned antibiotic classes. Over the last 20 years, an increase in resistance of P. aeruginosa to reserve antibiotics such as ceftazidime, and a dramatic decrease in susceptibility of Acinetobacter spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En esta investigación, el promedio de tiempo entre la quemadura y el primer desbridamiento no fue diferente entre pacientes con y sin bacteriemia (2,2 días vs 2,5 días, p 0,55); sin embargo, en el análisis multivariado se observó que los pacientes con quemaduras > 20% de SCQ y de segundo En el presente estudio, 9,6% (n: 25) de los pacientes recibieron antimicrobianos profilácticos por vía sistémica antes de ingresar a la cohorte; sin embargo, de manera semejante a lo reportado por Barajas-Nava y cols. 16 , no se cuantificó diferencia en la ocurrencia de bacteriemia en pacientes con y sin antimicrobianos. Rosanova y cols.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified