2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/291351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiofilm Activity of Chilean Propolis onStreptococcus mutansIs Influenced by the Year of Collection

Abstract: The chemical composition of propolis varies according to factors that could have an influence on its biological properties. Polyphenols from propolis have demonstrated an inhibitory effect on Streptococcus mutans growth. However, it is not known if different years of propolis collection may affect its activity. We aimed to elucidate if the year of collection of propolis influences its activity on Streptococcus mutans. Polyphenol-rich extracts were prepared from propolis collected in three different years, char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the presence of daidzein, rutine, and chlorogenic and gallic acid was not constant. The antimicrobial activity of the annual samples did not presented significant variations (MIC: 0.91, 0.22 and 0.39 µg/mL); however, the biofilm formation in S. mutans cultures treated with Chilean propolis showed to be influenced by the year of collection [197].…”
Section: Chilementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Otherwise, the presence of daidzein, rutine, and chlorogenic and gallic acid was not constant. The antimicrobial activity of the annual samples did not presented significant variations (MIC: 0.91, 0.22 and 0.39 µg/mL); however, the biofilm formation in S. mutans cultures treated with Chilean propolis showed to be influenced by the year of collection [197].…”
Section: Chilementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, some works have demonstrated the capacity of propolis extract to prevent the adherence of several microorganisms (Streptococcus mutans, and several Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains) on abiotic (smooth glass or microplate) and biotic (HEp-2 (Human Epithelioma) and HeLa (cervical carcinoma)) surfaces [33][34][35]. With the exception of Veloz et al [34], in the remaining works, the authors did not describe the chemical composition of propolis extracts; only refer the importance of phenol content on the inhibition of biofilm formation [33], or there is not ever any reference to the composition of the propolis sample [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of Veloz et al [34], in the remaining works, the authors did not describe the chemical composition of propolis extracts; only refer the importance of phenol content on the inhibition of biofilm formation [33], or there is not ever any reference to the composition of the propolis sample [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veloz et al . () evaluated the effect of propolis‐collecting year on the chemical composition of three propolis samples collected in the Andean region of La Araucanía, Chile, in the spring of the years 2008, 2010 and 2011, preparing polyphenol‐rich extracts. The antibacterial effect on Streptococcus mutans and biofilm formation was analysed.…”
Section: Propolis Chemical Composition and The Problem Of Standardizamentioning
confidence: 99%