2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Effect of Selected Root-End Filling Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
91
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of MTA to create an alkaline environment may explain its antibacterial effect against E. faecalis [6]. Previous studies have also demonstrated a significant antibacterial effect of MTA, IRM and glass ionomer like material against E. faecalis without being able to totally eliminate the bacterium [4,5,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ability of MTA to create an alkaline environment may explain its antibacterial effect against E. faecalis [6]. Previous studies have also demonstrated a significant antibacterial effect of MTA, IRM and glass ionomer like material against E. faecalis without being able to totally eliminate the bacterium [4,5,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the incorporation of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 13 bioactive glass fillers into relatively bioinert materials has gained popularity in recent years as an attempt to achieve more specific biological responses such as inducing antibacterial action [28] or promoting a particular cell response [29]. The antibacterial test used in this study was a modified direct contact test, which is a common antibacterial test used in the endodontic literature to test the antibacterial properties of root cements [4] and sealers [30]. However, the main limitation of the regular direct contact test is that it does not allow evaluation of microorganisms under biofilm conditions [5] because any attempt to disrupt the bacterial biofilm on cement surfaces would lead to crushing of the unset cement samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12,14,16 The main goals of using MTA and Portland cement are to induce dentin bridge formation and to maintain pulp vitality. 17 So, there is strong background that the PC should be used as pulpotomy materials in human primary teeth after sufficient clinical trial. Until these days, there are few reports on the use of PC as medicaments in human primary teeth, but significant body of research is needed to accept PC as an effective and economic substitute of MTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is used in dentistry, several studies evaluated the effect of MTA on microorganisms [1][2][3][4][5][6] , with conflicting results. Torabinejad et al 7) found that MTA was effective against facultative microorganism but not against other bacterial strains, including Enterococcus faecalis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%