2017
DOI: 10.7324/japs.2017.70327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial activity of Syzigium cumini leaf extracts against multidrug resistant pathogenic bacteria

Abstract: Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) and Escherichia coli strains were isolated from the Clinical specimens such as pus, wound, urine, ear swabs and blood collected from the Health care centers at Lucknow city of Northern India. All strains were tested and detected as multi-drug resistant against penicillin, ampicillin, cefpdoxime, sulphadiazine, nalidixic acid, erythromycin and amoxicillin. Antibacterial activity of Syzigium cumini leaf extracts in various solvents was also determined. The efficacy of the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from this, chloramphenicol against S. aureus MTCC 96 also showed a MIC value of 12.5 μg/mL . Similarly, the MIC value of gentamicin against this specific strain of B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Apart from this, chloramphenicol against S. aureus MTCC 96 also showed a MIC value of 12.5 μg/mL . Similarly, the MIC value of gentamicin against this specific strain of B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…107 According to earlier literature, observed MIC of ampicillin against the specific strains of S. aureus (MTCC 96) and E. coli (MTCC 443) was 0.19 and 0.04 mg/mL and are higher than our reported result (12.5 μg/mL against S. aureus and 25 μg/mL against E. coli). 108 Apart from this, chloramphenicol against S. aureus MTCC 96 also showed a MIC value of 12.5 μg/mL. 108 Similarly, the MIC value of gentamicin against this specific strain of B. cereus (MTCC 430) was reported to be 0.31 mg/ mL, which is quite higher than the obtained MIC value of hydrogel (μg/mL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation