“…It was also reported that the titer of anti-PS/PT antibodies in PAN cases with skin symptoms manifesting necrotizing vasculitis decreased significantly after treatments [10] , indicating that anti-PS/PT antibodies serve as markers of PAN. Additionally, Kawakami et al reported that serum anti-PS/PT IgM antibodies were higher in systemic vasculitis cases with skin involvements (3 cases of IgA vasculitis, 2 cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 1 case of microscopic polyangiitis, and 1 case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and 1 case of cutaneous arteritis than healthy controls and cases of systemic vasculitis without skin involvements (2 cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 2 cases of microscopic polyangiitis, 1 case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 1 case of rheumatoid vasculitis, and 1 case of PAN), but there was no significant difference in serum anti-PS/PT IgG antibody titers, suggesting that serum anti-PS/PT IgM antibodies were involved in the pathogenesis of cutaneous vasculitis [11] . Okano et al reported the overexpression of moesin in affected skin vessels and that the titer of serum anti-moesin antibodies in PAN cases with skin involvements due to necrotizing vasculitis is positively correlated with the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Vasculitis Damage Index [10] .…”