2015
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-14-0377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentrations in Premenopausal Women and Breast Cancer Risk

Abstract: Laboratory models support an inverse association between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and breast tumor development. Human studies are lacking; one study (N=105 cases, 204 controls) with prospectively-collected serum reported the opposite—an approximate 10-fold increase in breast cancer risk comparing 4th to 1st quartile AMH levels. We investigated the relation between serum AMH levels and breast cancer risk in a case-control (N=452 cases, 902 controls) study nested within the prospective Sister Study cohort of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
34
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Women selected for this analysis participated as controls in a nested case-control study of AMH and breast cancer risk that has been previously described (4). Briefly, to be eligible for selection in to the case-control study, Sister Study participants were required to be ages 35–54 at time of enrollment, have an archived serum sample, at least 1 intact ovary, and be categorized as premenopausal (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Women selected for this analysis participated as controls in a nested case-control study of AMH and breast cancer risk that has been previously described (4). Briefly, to be eligible for selection in to the case-control study, Sister Study participants were required to be ages 35–54 at time of enrollment, have an archived serum sample, at least 1 intact ovary, and be categorized as premenopausal (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, to be eligible for selection in to the case-control study, Sister Study participants were required to be ages 35–54 at time of enrollment, have an archived serum sample, at least 1 intact ovary, and be categorized as premenopausal (4). Premenopausal status was defined as reporting at least one menstrual cycle in the 12 months prior to study enrollment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first prospective analysis to evaluate this association (n=105 cases, 204 controls) showed a strong positive association between serum AMH levels and breast cancer risk (p-trend <0.001) (14). These findings were recently supported by two case-control studies nested within the Sister Study cohort (n=452 cases, 902 controls) (15) and the Nurses’ Health Study II (n=539 cases, 471 controls) (16), both of which also demonstrated a significant positive association between AMH concentrations and breast cancer risk, with a more than 2-fold increased risk among women with the highest AMH concentrations compared to those with AMH <LOD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Another study of 10 normal weight and 10 obese ovulatory young women between ages 18 and 35, AMH levels were 34% lower in the obese group (17). AMH levels peak in the mid-20s and subsequently decline with age, becoming non-detectable by menopause (15, 19, 56, 57). Since participants in the DISC06 Follow-up Study were ages 25–29 and consequently had relatively high AMH concentrations, there may have been insufficient variation at low concentrations in AMH levels to observe associations with current or earlier life BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%