2013
DOI: 10.1177/1368430213514121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism

Abstract: System justification theory (SJT) posits that people are motivated to believe that the social system they live in is fair, desirable, and how it should be, especially in contexts that heighten the system justification motive. Past researchers have suggested that opposition to feminists may be motivated by the threat that feminism presents to the legitimacy of the status quo, but this hypothesis has not been tested empirically. In this article, we present three studies that directly test the idea that antifemin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A motivation to justify the unjust GD may lead individuals to endorse explanations that portray gender differences as stemming from deep, innate natural causes (Brescoll, Uhlmann, & Newman, 2013). System justification theory suggests that people have an essential motive to view their social system as just, fair, and good and will engage in different strategies to justify the status quo (Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004;Sidanius & Pratto, 1999, Yeung, Kay, & Peach, 2014.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Coping To Gdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A motivation to justify the unjust GD may lead individuals to endorse explanations that portray gender differences as stemming from deep, innate natural causes (Brescoll, Uhlmann, & Newman, 2013). System justification theory suggests that people have an essential motive to view their social system as just, fair, and good and will engage in different strategies to justify the status quo (Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004;Sidanius & Pratto, 1999, Yeung, Kay, & Peach, 2014.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Coping To Gdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisamente esta reprobación del feminismo se ve en muchas ocasiones reforzada por los argumentos que hacen que el feminismo o las personas feministas se vean representadas, frecuentemente por los medios de comunicación, como militantes y psicológicamente poco atractivas (Percy y Kremer, 1995), sin olvidar los estereotipos en cuanto a la apariencia física de tipo masculino a los que se suele asociar el término feminista, además de tantas otras connotaciones negativas. Una de las principales consecuencias de esto es que las mujeres se ven desanimadas a identificarse como tales, como ya expusimos al principio de este trabajo (Percy y Kremer, 1995;Swirsky y Angelone, 2014;Yeung et al, 2014). Existe una imagen conflictiva emergente en la que muchas mujeres apoyan los ideales feministas, pero no se identifican con ellos por la etiqueta negativa a la que se asocia y que psicológicamente implicaría la pertenencia a un grupo señalado por el resto de la sociedad y que contribuiría a una identidad social considerada como poco positiva, con la consiguiente repercusión en la autoestima (Tajfel y Turner, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En su estudio, y en consonancia con los resultados de estudios con muestra española como el de Ferrer y Bosch (1998), encontraron que casi el 50% de las mujeres entrevistadas no querían identificarse con el feminismo debido al estigma asociado a esta ideología. Por su parte, el trabajo de Amy W. Yeung et al (2014) también plantea la hostilidad antifeminista como un factor importante en el hecho de que las personas, y especialmente las mujeres, no se consideren feministas. Los resultados de su estudio muestran un mayor rechazo de las ideas referidas a la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres cuando estas ideas procedían de personas que indicaban al grupo experimental que se consideraban feministas.…”
unclassified
“…The role of politicised identification may be complicated in matters of gender equality, especially when considered alongside men's identification with their own gender. Past research in Canada and the United States has shown that many men and women show ambivalence about and even hostility towards feminism (Yeung, Kay, & Peach, 2014). Additionally, both women and men from a US university were more likely to agree with feminist ideas or endorse covert feminism, rather than identify as feminists or endorse overt feminism (Burn et al, 2000).…”
Section: Politicised Identification: Focus On Feminismmentioning
confidence: 99%