2014
DOI: 10.1590/1678-41626072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Escherichia coli activity of Brazilian plant extracts: New trends in Veterinary research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, our researchers have been systematically developing projects aiming to identify antimicrobial active extracts from the Amazon and Atlantic Brazilian rainforests. We have studied more than 2,000 plant extracts and essential oils as antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus (Pinto, 2020), Staphylococcus epidermidis (Belo, 2022), Enterococcus faecalis (Castilho, 2009), Streptococcus mutans (Bento, 2020), Streptococcus sanguinis (Silva, 2009), Escherichia coli (Camargo, 2016), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans (Rudiger, 2021), Malassezia pachydermatis (Silva, 2018), Malassezia furfur ( Silva, 2018 ), and Listeria monocytogenes (Ceruso et al, 2020), which are shown in the present article as a result of a 15-year study in antimicrobial-active natural product identification (Suffredini et al, 2002;Suffredini et al, 2004;Suffredini et al, 2006a;Suffredini et al, 2006b;Younes et al, 2007;Castilho et al, 2013;Camargo and Suffredini, 2014;Castilho et al, 2014;da Silva et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2016;Suffredini et al, 2016;Martins et al, 2019a;Martins et al, 2019b;Camargo et al, 2020;Silva et al, 2020).. The present article reports a step-by-step methodology for identifying antimicrobial products in nature that comprises plant collection, the different tests used to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity, a test to determine toxicity, and a statistical-based algorithm to classify the extracts according to their potential.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent decades, our researchers have been systematically developing projects aiming to identify antimicrobial active extracts from the Amazon and Atlantic Brazilian rainforests. We have studied more than 2,000 plant extracts and essential oils as antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus (Pinto, 2020), Staphylococcus epidermidis (Belo, 2022), Enterococcus faecalis (Castilho, 2009), Streptococcus mutans (Bento, 2020), Streptococcus sanguinis (Silva, 2009), Escherichia coli (Camargo, 2016), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans (Rudiger, 2021), Malassezia pachydermatis (Silva, 2018), Malassezia furfur ( Silva, 2018 ), and Listeria monocytogenes (Ceruso et al, 2020), which are shown in the present article as a result of a 15-year study in antimicrobial-active natural product identification (Suffredini et al, 2002;Suffredini et al, 2004;Suffredini et al, 2006a;Suffredini et al, 2006b;Younes et al, 2007;Castilho et al, 2013;Camargo and Suffredini, 2014;Castilho et al, 2014;da Silva et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2016;Suffredini et al, 2016;Martins et al, 2019a;Martins et al, 2019b;Camargo et al, 2020;Silva et al, 2020).. The present article reports a step-by-step methodology for identifying antimicrobial products in nature that comprises plant collection, the different tests used to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity, a test to determine toxicity, and a statistical-based algorithm to classify the extracts according to their potential.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To optimize the costs of the random-chemotaxonomic plant collection strategy, small amounts of plant material are collected in the field, resulting in small amounts of plant extracts, so it is vital to adjust the in vitro assay scales to the use of micrograms of plant extracts A proposed ranking of 111 plant extracts according to their antimicrobial activity efficacy and low toxicity. Suffredini et al 10.3389/frabi.2023.1122400 Frontiers in Antibiotics frontiersin.org (Suffredini et al, 2002;Suffredini et al, 2004;Suffredini et al, 2006a;Suffredini et al, 2006b;Younes et al, 2007;Castilho et al, 2013;Camargo and Suffredini, 2014;Castilho et al, 2014;da Silva et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2016;Suffredini et al, 2016;Martins et al, 2019a;Martins et al, 2019b;Camargo et al, 2020;Silva et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli 51A, characterized by a virulent and non-resistant profile, was classified in the B2 phylogenetic group, and was named ONT:H7. E. coli ATCC ® 25922™ was used in the initial screening made with more than 1300 plant extracts obtained from the Amazon Forest, which resulted in four active extracts, being EB127 one of them [13]. For a more accurate and detailed antimicrobial analysis, the three strains of E. coli that were obtained from frigate's cloaca were introduced in the analysis, to verify whether the antimicrobial potential of the plant extract would be the same, or if it would be specific to each kind of micro-organism, considering their characteristics of virulence and resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loganic acid (L) was identified in the sample named UN-365, which was obtained from the 10%ACN/H 2 O fraction, by CC, analytical thin-layer chromatography and preparative thin-layer chromatography. Loganic acid was identified by means of 1 H-NMR and 13 C-NMR [29] (Table -5).…”
Section: Loganic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation