2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2021.100260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy remission despite prior anti-CD19 antibody Tafasitamab in relapsed/refractory DLBCL

Abstract: Highlights Disease progression following anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody Tafasitamab treatment should not preclude subsequent anti-CD19 CART-cell therapy. Previous studies have demonstrated sequential anti-CD19 to be effective. Larger studies among R/R DLBCL patients across anti-CD19 modalities are needed to guide sequencing of therapies following initial anti-CD19 therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tabbara and colleagues described a case of a patient receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel 4 months after the administration of the last cycle of tafasitamab and lenalidomide for refractory DLBCL. 70 This patient obtained a complete remission after axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment, which was sustained up to 24 months. Regarding loncastuximab tesirine, the series by Thapa and colleagues reported the outcome of 14 patients receiving commercial or investigational CD19-CAR T cells for DLBCL R/R after loncastuximab tesirine treatment in the context of two phase I and II clinical trials.…”
Section: Reported Clinical Experience Of Cd19targeting Therapies Sequ...mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tabbara and colleagues described a case of a patient receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel 4 months after the administration of the last cycle of tafasitamab and lenalidomide for refractory DLBCL. 70 This patient obtained a complete remission after axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment, which was sustained up to 24 months. Regarding loncastuximab tesirine, the series by Thapa and colleagues reported the outcome of 14 patients receiving commercial or investigational CD19-CAR T cells for DLBCL R/R after loncastuximab tesirine treatment in the context of two phase I and II clinical trials.…”
Section: Reported Clinical Experience Of Cd19targeting Therapies Sequ...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Very limited experience with CAR T cell therapy has been reported after treatment with tafasitamab or loncastuximab. Tabbara and colleagues described a case of a patient receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel 4 months after the administration of the last cycle of tafasitamab and lenalidomide for refractory DLBCL 70 . This patient obtained a complete remission after axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment, which was sustained up to 24 months.…”
Section: Aspects Influencing Cd19‐targeting Treatment Choice and Sequ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, remission of DLBCL after CART19 was reported in one patient who previously failed to Tafasitamab. CD19-targeted therapies could be effective despite being administered sequentially ( 122 ).…”
Section: Treatment Options After Cart19 Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike tafasitamab, loncastuximab, and the currently approved CAR T cell products, which target CD19, polatuzumab targets CD79b and, therefore, treatment with BR-pola might be preferred in patients who progress on prior CD19-directed therapies. Notably, the limited data show that progression on one type of CD19-directed therapy does not preclude responses to other CD19-directed therapies as evident by the responses seen in the small number of patients who received CAR T cells before loncastuximab on the LOTIS-2 trial (although biopsy-proven CD19 expression was required in the LOTIS-2 trial) as well as responses to CAR T-cell therapies in patients who received prior loncastuximab or lenalidomide plus tafasitamab [27,43,44].…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%