OBJECTIVE -In Spanish women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we aimed to study the progression to diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) and identify predictive factors.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -In 696 women with GDM and 70 control women, glucose tolerance was evaluated postpartum and at 5-year intervals.RESULTS -In the GDM group, the cumulative risk for diabetes and AGT was 13.8 and 42.4% after 11 years compared with 0 and 2.8% in control women, respectively (P Ͻ 0.05). Independent predictive factors for diabetes were previous hyperglycemia, four abnormal glucose values on the diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or overt diabetes during pregnancy, 2-h blood glucose on the diagnostic OGTT Ն11.7 mmol/l, gestational age at diagnosis Ͻ24 weeks, and prepregnancy BMI Ն26.4 kg/m 2 . All of these factors (some with different cutoff points) in addition to fasting glycemia were predictors of AGT also. The risk was nonlinear. Four abnormal glucose values on the diagnostic OGTT or overt diabetes during pregnancy was the strongest predictive factor for diabetes (relative risk 3.92), and prepregnancy BMI was the predictive factor with the highest attributable fraction in the whole group (13.3%). When first postpartum OGTT data were included in the analysis, predictors changed, but the overall prediction was similar.CONCLUSIONS -Spanish women with GDM have an increased risk of diabetes and AGT. Predictive factors display a nonlinear relationship. The strongest predictive factor for diabetes was four abnormal glucose values on the diagnostic OGTT or overt diabetes during pregnancy; the factor with the highest attributable fraction in the whole group was prepregnancy BMI.

We investigated whether the diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma (diffuse sclerosing PC) and insular carcinoma (IC), two different subforms of differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland, have different clinical behaviors and prognosis in order to select appropriate therapy. The characteristics of clinical presentation, and outcome after therapy were evaluated in a series of 113 patients (18 males and 95 females) with differentiated thyroid carcinoma treated with the same protocol, of which 7 had diffuse sclerosing PC and 6 had IC; within this series, patients with diffuse sclerosing PC and IC were compared with 76 cases of papillary carcinoma (PC) and 24 cases of follicular carcinoma (FC), respectively. Diffuse sclerosing PC patients were younger (23+/-9 vs. 38+/-16 years) and had a higher degree of lymphatic metastases at diagnosis (100%) than patients with PC (47%). Five of 7 patients with diffuse sclerosing PC were alive and without evidence of disease compared to 34 of 76 patients with PC at follow-up (6.4+/-5.1 and 7.9+/-7 years, respectively). No prognostic differences were found between them. IC showed a more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis and a more aggressive clinical course with a higher percent of metastases and mortality than patients with FC at follow-up (1 patient died and 5 were alive with persistent disease at 4.8+/-3.7 years for IC; 22 were alive, 13 of them with persistent disease; and 2 died at 8.4+/-5.3 years for FC). We conclude that patients with diffuse sclerosing PC do not require a different treatment than that given to PC patients, while in contrast, IC cases need a more aggressive therapeutic approach.

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa‐cel) is a second‐generation autologous CD19‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL). The approval was based on the results of phase II JULIET trial, with a best overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate in infused patients of 52% and 40%, respectively. We report outcomes with tisa‐cel in the standard‐of‐care (SOC) setting for R/R LBCL. Data from all patients with R/R LBCL who underwent leukapheresis from December 2018 until June 2020 with the intent to receive SOC tisa‐cel were retrospectively collected at 10 Spanish institutions. Toxicities were graded according to ASTCT criteria and responses were assessed as per Lugano 2014 classification. Of 91 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 75 (82%) received tisa‐cel therapy. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 5% and 1%, respectively; non‐relapse mortality was 4%. Among the infused patients, best ORR and CR were 60% and 32%, respectively, with a median duration of response of 8.9 months. With a median follow‐up of 14.1 months from CAR T‐cell infusion, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 3 months and 10.7 months, respectively. At 12 months, patients in CR at first disease evaluation had a PFS of 87% and OS of 93%. Patients with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase showed a shorter PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. Treatment with tisa‐cel for patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL in a European SOC setting showed a manageable safety profile and durable complete responses.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We performed a retrospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of axi-cel and tisa-cel outside the setting of a clinical trial. Data from consecutive patients with R/R LBCL who underwent apheresis for axi-cel or tisa-cel were retrospectively collected from 12 Spanish centers. A total of 307 patients underwent apheresis for axi-cel (n=152) and tisa-cel (n=155) from Nov-2018 to Aug-2021, of which 261 (85%) received a CAR-T infusion (88% and 82%, respectively). Median time from apheresis to infusion was 41 days for axi-cel and 52 days for tisa-cel (p=0.006). None of the baseline characteristics were significantly different between both cohorts. Both cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events (NE) were more frequent in the axi-cel group (88% vs 73%, p=0.003, and 42% vs 16%, p

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Duration of DM and chronic hypertension were the most influential factors related to adverse perinatal outcomes in women with type 1 DM, and poor metabolic control and macrosomia in women with type 2 DM.