2007
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/10/010
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropic prediction for a large toy landscape

Abstract: The successful anthropic prediction of the cosmological constant depends crucially on the assumption of a flat prior distribution. However, previous calculations in simplified landscape models showed that the prior distribution is staggered, suggesting a conflict with anthropic predictions. Here we analytically calculate the full distribution, including the prior and anthropic selection effects, in a toy landscape model with a realistic number of vacua, N ∼ 10 500 . We show that it is possible for the fractal … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exact spectrum requires diagonalizing an N × N matrix, which is computationally intensive for large N . A useful and intuitive approach is the "downward" approximation [90,91], which neglects upward transitions. To see how this is justified, recall the detailed balance condition (25).…”
Section: Downward Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exact spectrum requires diagonalizing an N × N matrix, which is computationally intensive for large N . A useful and intuitive approach is the "downward" approximation [90,91], which neglects upward transitions. To see how this is justified, recall the detailed balance condition (25).…”
Section: Downward Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But considerable progress has been made by the more pedestrian method of elimination. The number of simple candidate measures is not large, and many make wrong predictions, which go by colorful names such as Q-catastrophe, youngness paradox, Boltzmann brain paradox, and staggering problem [56,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. But they just come down to an old-fashioned (and usually violent) conflict with observation.…”
Section: Dynamical Selection Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the details of the string landscape, the proposal may render most vacua dynamically inaccessible (the "staggering problem" of Refs. [23,24]). This would also amount to a conflict with observation, namely the prediction that we should observe a much larger cosmological constant with probability very close to 1.…”
Section: B the Measure Problem: A Phenomenological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%