1989
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198910000-00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anteroposterior Drawer Measurements in the Knee Using an Instrumented Test Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the anatomic zero position as compartmental femorotibial alignment in the unstressed position explains the fact that, with the patient supine, a physiologic posterior joint play occurs at the starting position before clinical evaluation. Edixhoven et al (1989) reported a 3.5 mm posterior starting position in a posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee population. This posterior starting position can be determined clinically by measuring the tuberosity position or depth with a ruler before assessing posterior cruciate ligament disruption or insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Determining the anatomic zero position as compartmental femorotibial alignment in the unstressed position explains the fact that, with the patient supine, a physiologic posterior joint play occurs at the starting position before clinical evaluation. Edixhoven et al (1989) reported a 3.5 mm posterior starting position in a posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee population. This posterior starting position can be determined clinically by measuring the tuberosity position or depth with a ruler before assessing posterior cruciate ligament disruption or insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our definition of the anatomic zero position is supported by Rauschning's (1979) cryosectional anatomy slices in the sagittal plane ( Figure 5). However, the anatomic zero position differs from the starting reference position used at clinical evaluation (Gurtler et al 1990, Miiller et al 1988, Torg et al 1976, at instrumented clinical testing (Edixhoven et al 1989, Markolf et al 1978, and at arthrometric measurement (Daniel et al 1985, Daniel andStone 1990) because the weight force of the leg and the anteriorly superimposed weight of the instrumented testing device alter the starting reference position in the posterior sense (patient supine, thigh supported, quadriceps relaxed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They determined that there is no difference between two groups on their "one leg" balance test (45). A certain tendency to better balance in the nonpreferred leg was observed, some authors did not demonstrated differences between dominant and nondominant extremities in athletes (2,16,31). It is stated that none of the tests performed revealed statistically significant differences in balance ability between the preferred and the nonpreferred leg (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%