2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior cingulate error‐related activity is modulated by predicted reward

Abstract: Learning abilities depend on detection and exploitation of errors. In primates, this function involves the anterior cingulate cortex. However, whether anterior cingulate error-related activity indicates occurrence of inappropriate responses or results from other computations is debated. Here we have tested whether reward-related parameters modulate error-related activity of anterior cingulate neurons. Recordings in monkeys performing stimulus-reward associations and preliminary data obtained with a problem-sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
175
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(43 reference statements)
16
175
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now clear that ACC S does not simply represent the occurrence of an error but is instead important whenever an outcome suggests the need to revise the estimate of the value of an action (Walton et al, 2004;Amiez et al, 2005Amiez et al, , 2006Kennerley et al, 2006;Matsumoto et al, 2007;Quilodran et al, 2008). Our results suggest that OFC can be similarly important in the learning of new stimulus-reinforcement associations and not simply in effecting a reversal in behavior after an error as has been previously highlighted (Fellows and Farah, 2003;Izquierdo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is now clear that ACC S does not simply represent the occurrence of an error but is instead important whenever an outcome suggests the need to revise the estimate of the value of an action (Walton et al, 2004;Amiez et al, 2005Amiez et al, , 2006Kennerley et al, 2006;Matsumoto et al, 2007;Quilodran et al, 2008). Our results suggest that OFC can be similarly important in the learning of new stimulus-reinforcement associations and not simply in effecting a reversal in behavior after an error as has been previously highlighted (Fellows and Farah, 2003;Izquierdo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…By making it harder for subjects to determine which option is the most valuable, it may be possible to gain insights into prefrontal function not seen in deterministic settings. Recent evidence suggests ACC S is active and critical whenever reinforcement, whether positive or negative, provides information that allows a revision of the value of a choice (Matsumoto et al, 2003;Walton et al, 2004;Amiez et al, 2005Amiez et al, , 2006Kennerley et al, 2006), and it is possible that OFC performs a similar function. Experiment 4, therefore, examined whether OFC lesions impaired stimulus-reward learning in conditions in which each stimulus was allocated reward stochastically in a threechoice stimulus discrimination task ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, local recordings in the banks of anterior cingulate sulcus revealed increased activity after errors, reduced rewards, and the absence of expected rewards (Ito et al, 2003;Amiez et al, 2005;Emeric et al, 2008;Quilodran et al, 2008). Although errorrelated activity has been reported in other areas (e.g., supplementary eye field, lateral prefrontal cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex), the incidence of outcome-related activity is particularly high in the ACC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, during stimulus processing and delay epochs in working memory paradigms, subsets of neurons encode the expected reward outcome associated with the stimulus (9). Third, following the behavioral response to a target stimulus, neuronal groups in ACC signal whether the behavioral response was incorrect or resulted in unexpected reward outcome (10)(11)(12)(13). Consequently, ACC neurons signal the adjustment of behavior following changes in task demands or unexpected outcomes on previous trials (8,14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%