The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.7863/jum.1997.16.1.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenatal diagnosis of Wilms tumor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately twenty cases in pediatric population could be found with the use of available computer-assisted medical literature search programs. 3 , 5 , 6 , 10-12 Clinical and radiological features of our patient were similar of those described in the literature. 4 , 8 Histopathological analysis was compatible with a nephroblastoma blastemal type as described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Approximately twenty cases in pediatric population could be found with the use of available computer-assisted medical literature search programs. 3 , 5 , 6 , 10-12 Clinical and radiological features of our patient were similar of those described in the literature. 4 , 8 Histopathological analysis was compatible with a nephroblastoma blastemal type as described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[1] Antenatal detection of Wilms' tumor is very rare and only nine cases have been reported till now. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The index case was prenatally detected to have a renal mass at a primary health center in a peripheral village but no follow-up was done. The child presented to us after 7 months with advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these reports, prenatal WT is described as a solid echogenic mass or a heterogeneous lesion with multiple cystic areas due to hemorrhage or necrosis [5,21] . The mass may be unencapsulated or well defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%