2009
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-4-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antemortem diagnosis of asbestosis by screening chest radiograph correlated with postmortem histologic features of asbestosis: a study of 273 cases

Abstract: Background: Accuracy in the clinical diagnosis of asbestosis has significant implications for the future health of affected patients as well as serious medicolegal implications for both patients and asbestos-associated industries. The radiographic gold-standard for diagnosis of asbestosis has been the plain chest radiograph, and in many asbestosis-screening clinics, chest radiograph abnormalities in conjunction with a history of asbestos exposure have been the mainstay of diagnosis. No studies have yet compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on study participants who received industrial injuries' compensation before 1997 was available: of the 363 participants certified as suffering from asbestosis with at least 10% disability, 303 (83%) had died by December 2005, 109 (30%) were listed on the Asbestosis Register, and 33 (30%) of the latter had asbestosis recorded as the underlying cause of death. These statistics highlight the difficulty, which has been reported elsewhere [e.g., Berry, 1981; Mizell et al, 2009], in ascertaining asbestosis cases using death certificate and clinical data rather than pathology/histology. While recognizing the limitations of the Asbestosis Register, and to a lesser extent the Mesothelioma Register, they do provide consistent data series over an extended period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Information on study participants who received industrial injuries' compensation before 1997 was available: of the 363 participants certified as suffering from asbestosis with at least 10% disability, 303 (83%) had died by December 2005, 109 (30%) were listed on the Asbestosis Register, and 33 (30%) of the latter had asbestosis recorded as the underlying cause of death. These statistics highlight the difficulty, which has been reported elsewhere [e.g., Berry, 1981; Mizell et al, 2009], in ascertaining asbestosis cases using death certificate and clinical data rather than pathology/histology. While recognizing the limitations of the Asbestosis Register, and to a lesser extent the Mesothelioma Register, they do provide consistent data series over an extended period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The advent of high resolution computed tomography enabled the identification of earlier radiological findings. However, this method is expensive and less commonly available, and trained professionals are necessary to interpret the examination [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to mesothelioma risk trends, asbestosis is a fibrotic interstitial lung disease with a comparable latency period that has also generally diminished in both incidence and clinical severity in the past two decades. This trend has raised questions about how many valid asbestosis cases arise from the many claims that today are often based solely on equivocal radiographic findings and questionable occupational history of asbestos exposure (Bang et al, 2008 ; Mizell et al, 2009 ; Harding and Darnton, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%