Antecedents or Processes? Determinants of Perceived Effectiveness of Interorganizational Collaborations for Public Service Delivery

Chen, Bin

doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.524836

Cited by 110 publications

(120 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

105

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…45 Within the different stages of partnership development (e.g. formation, selection, implementation, design and operations, institutionalization), many subprocesses exist, such as mechanisms for mapping organizational fit, undertaking formal and informal risk management processes and exploring different structures and design features to enable experimentation in the pursuit of shared value (such as convening groups for joint decision making, building trust and navigating organizational autonomy 47 ).…”

Section: 44mentioning

confidence: 99%

Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative

Willis

Greene

Abramowicz

et al. 2016

Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Public Health Agency of Canada's Multi-sectoral Partnerships Initiative, administered by the Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention (CCDP), brings together diverse partners to design, implement and advance innovative approaches for improving population health. This article describes the development and initial priorities of an action research project (a learning and improvement strategy) that aims to facilitate continuous improvement of the CCDP's partnership initiative and contribute to the evidence on multi-sectoral partnerships.

show abstract

Section: 44mentioning

confidence: 99%

Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative

Willis

Greene

Abramowicz

et al. 2016

Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding the latter, the collaborative outcome is referred to the capacity of the partnerships to stimulate the community problem solving (Ostrom, 1990), to develop inter-organizational learning (Chen, 2010), and to transfer instrumental transaction in socially embedded relationships (Ring & Van de Ven, 1994). These collaboration effects are consistent with the "perceived effectiveness" of the collaborative working on the side of the participants.…”

Section: From the Collaborative Governing Process To The Collaborativmentioning

confidence: 48%

Beyond the Orthodoxy of New Public Management: The Outcome Evaluation in the Italian Strategic Cities

Pepe

Magliacani²

2015

UCPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration is still being debated in public management studies. As specific way of creating public value, the collaborative working is mainly encouraged by the austerity, that implies putting resources together, not only the financial ones. Hence, new forms of service integration are asked in order to improve public service delivery in a more efficient and effectiveness way. Even if public administrations have embraced this trend, the focus adopted is mainly oriented to the planning and the programming approach rather than to the evaluation phase. What is the outcome of public service delivered through a collaborative approach? What is the outcome evaluation of the collaborative process? These kinds of outcome are evaluated? This study aims at investigating which kind of outcome is outlined by the Italian Strategic Cities in their collaborative strategic planning for cultural services delivery. As a main finding, the research extends the knowledge on the outcome evaluation of the collaboration in terms of process and in terms of impact of public services delivered.

show abstract

“…In the case of interorganizational networks, these features can be understood as advantages and benefits provided by collaboration such as increasing the bargaining power of member organizations and targeting economies of scale (Balmann, Odening, Weikard, & Brandes, 1996;Das & Teng, 2000), splitting the costs of communication and marketing (Lamb, Hair, & McDaniel, 2008), sharing the risks of activities with other companies (Sadowski & Duysters, 2008), accessing reliable knowledge and information, providing new learning (Lee, Kim, & Kim, 2014;Chen, 2010), obtaining legitimacy (Pesämaa, 2007) and innovation (Westerlund & Rajala, 2010).…”

Section: Dependence On Environmental Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Survival of Interorganizational Networks: A Proposal Based on Resource Dependence Theory

Klein

Pereira

2016

RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo pode ser copiado, distribuído, exibido, transmitido ou adaptado desde que citados, de forma clara e explícita, o nome da revista, a edição, o ano e as páginas nas quais o artigo foi publicado originalmente, mas sem sugerir que a RAM endosse a reutilização do artigo. Esse termo de licenciamento deve ser explicitado para os casos de reutilização ou distribuição para terceiros. Não é permitido o uso para fins comerciais. Professor of Business Administration at the Universidade de Cruz Alta (Unicruz).Rodovia Municipal Jacob Della Méa, Km 5.6, Parada Benito, BRENO AUGUSTO DINIZ PEREIRA Doctor in Business Administration from the College of Business Administration at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Professor of Business Administration at the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM).Avenida Roraima, 1.000, Prédio 74C, Camobi, Santa Maria -RS -Brasil -CEP 97105-900 ISSN 1678-6971 (on-line) • http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n4p153-175. Submissão: 30 out. 2015. Aceitação: 3 maio 2016. Sistema de avaliação: às cegas dupla (double blind review ABSTRACTPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to depict a theoretical proposal for analyzing the influence of three facets of an organization's dependence on the survival of interorganizational networks: on the environment, on the other members and on the network. Originality/gap/relevance/implications: This paper assists business leaders in showing the dependence tensions of enterprises on the market and networks. The understanding of relational changes and benefits provided by the network during its evolution also has an impact on enterprises' dependency. This paper is therefore original as it makes the contribution essential to a nascent stream of research. Key methodological aspects:The conceptualization of this study is based on the Resource Dependence Theory to direct network survival. The methodology of the paper is based on a theoretical essay for the formation of an analytical background of the subject. It presents an insight in a manner that sheds light on the subject and sets the stage for future research. Summary of key results: Does not apply. In this article, we did not make an empirical investigation. Key considerations/conclusions: The conceptualization of this study has been based solely on the Resource Dependency Theory to direct network survival. Furthermore, additional research is needed to empirically validate the framework.

show abstract

Antecedents or Processes? Determinants of Perceived Effectiveness of Interorganizational Collaborations for Public Service Delivery

Cited by 110 publications

References 47 publications

Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative

Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative

Beyond the Orthodoxy of New Public Management: The Outcome Evaluation in the Italian Strategic Cities

The Survival of Interorganizational Networks: A Proposal Based on Resource Dependence Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About