1998
DOI: 10.1108/02683949810214995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents of co‐ordination in academic international project research

Abstract: Suggests that the intellectual distance among scholars is a cause of difficult co‐ordination during the project. The intellectual distance among scholars is the distance among their cognitive systems, a wide concept including a multi‐level belonging: institutional, disciplinary, paradigmatic, and cultural belonging, as well as social networking, etc. The higher the cumulative intellectual distance within the academic international research projects (AIRP), the higher the co‐ordination needs during the process.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, managing international research networks has its peculiarities. Due to the loose institutional bonds, the cultural diversity and the geographic spread such networks have to rely on a number of mechanisms for co-ordination and control (for different types of such mechanisms see, e.g., Mayrhofer 1998;Turati et al 1998).…”
Section: Establishing and Maintaining Research Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, managing international research networks has its peculiarities. Due to the loose institutional bonds, the cultural diversity and the geographic spread such networks have to rely on a number of mechanisms for co-ordination and control (for different types of such mechanisms see, e.g., Mayrhofer 1998;Turati et al 1998).…”
Section: Establishing and Maintaining Research Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is possible to use a cross-cultural team as a partial solution (e.g., Michailova & Liuhto, 2000;Nason & Pulillutla, 1998;Teagarden et al, 1995;Turati, Usai, & Ravagnani, 1998). International management writers commonly advocate collaboration between researchers from different countries, each researcher possessing the requisite knowledge of his or her culture (Douglas & Craig, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issues inherent in team-based research are directly addressed in a 1998 special issue of the Journal of Managerial Psychology. Here, models of effective research teams are provided (Flory, 1998;Nason and Pillutla, 1998;Teagarden, 1998), various perspectives on how such teams can operate successfully are offered (Hoogendoorn, 1998;Müller, 1998;Turati et al, 1998), and the challenges for those teams which operate internationally are discussed (Bournois and Chevalier, 1998). The authors of the last article comment on the particular challenge of 'dealing with difference' (in terms of team members), commenting that 'the management of such projects boils down to monitoring both differentiation and integration' (p. 212).…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Gersick's research was with project teams (not with research teams per se), it may be argued that academic research teams are most similar to 'task teams' (and/or project teams), in that they are 'a group of people brought together specifically to complete a specific assignment in a limited time' (O'Connor et al, 2003: 358). This comment is echoed by Turati et al (1998) who focus on what they call 'academic international research projects' which they define as 'a group of researchers, affiliated with organizations, who have joined together for a common purpose and who interface to "leverage" the collective intelligence, skills, and resources of the members in an intellectual joint venture ' (pp. 188-9).…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%