2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents and performance consequences of learning success in international joint ventures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable "Dynamic Marketing Capability" is evaluated by means of a scale already established, which encompasses all the aspects concerning the variable (Rodenbach and Brettel, 2012). "National performance" and "International performance" are measured with the scale of Farrell et al (2011).…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable "Dynamic Marketing Capability" is evaluated by means of a scale already established, which encompasses all the aspects concerning the variable (Rodenbach and Brettel, 2012). "National performance" and "International performance" are measured with the scale of Farrell et al (2011).…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that culture influences the kind of information people prefer and the manner in which that information is processed. Drawing upon previous literature, Farrell, Oczkowski, and Kharabsheh (2011) bring forward the concept of "learning orientation", a set of organizational values that influence how the organization interprets, evaluates and uses information. They find that companies that integrate learning within their culture can in fact benefit from higher levels of learning success.…”
Section: Top Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our focus is on growth and profitability, we chose to measure the company's performance vis-à-vis that of its competitors. Following other studies (Baker & Sinkula, 1999;Slater & Narver, 2000), it was decided to use a multifaceted and unidimensional scale based on Farrell, Oczkowski, and Kharabsheh (2011), which includes five areas of performance: (i) customer loyalty, (ii) success of new products, (iii) sales growth, (iv) return on investment and (v) overall performance. Due to its nature, this scale cannot include reverse-polarity items.It was followed the eliminating items process from the abovementioned scales, which is common in empirical research (Wieland, Durach Christian, Kembro, & Treiblmaier, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%