2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijmc.2013.055750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents and outcomes of attachment towards smartphone applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies also found that, when selecting their phone models, women placed a greater emphasis on the safety features of the phone (such as applications that enabled them to find their phone when lost). This finding is consistent with the principal in attachment theory, which states that individuals will often seek physical or psychological protection from the attachment figure (Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Youth Marketsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The studies also found that, when selecting their phone models, women placed a greater emphasis on the safety features of the phone (such as applications that enabled them to find their phone when lost). This finding is consistent with the principal in attachment theory, which states that individuals will often seek physical or psychological protection from the attachment figure (Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Youth Marketsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most recently, Kim et al (2013) found that students' attachment to an application had a positive effect on their attitude toward the application. This attachment can be understood to be an agreement between expected and required technological experience.…”
Section: Technological Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized influence of exercise app self-efficacy and exercise app use, however, failed to receive support. This seems surprising, given the results of similar research have found self-efficacy to be important in media use (e.g., Kim et al, 2013), particularly for health information (Lagoe & Atkin, 2015). One possible explanation for why exercise app self-efficacy may not be relevant to those who use exercise apps could stem from the relative maturity of this innovation; that is, participants of this study know how to use smartphone apps, rendering the relationship between self-efficacy and exercise app use moot as the practice becomes normalized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Given its importance for Internet skills, self-efficacy appears to play a dynamic role in smartphone app use (e.g., Kim, Jun, Han, & Kim, 2013) and by extension, smartphone exercise app use. The present study seeks to understand the role of smartphone exercise app self-efficacy, which is defined as "how much a person believes he or she has the ability to operate the functions of a smartphone exercise app."…”
Section: Hey Nice Run!: Exploring Factors Related To Exercise Self-mentioning
confidence: 99%