Antecedents and Consequences of Reflexivity in New Product Idea Screening^*

Abstract

Pre-development activities, such as new product idea screening, are considered to play an important role in innovation success. At the screening stage, a management team evaluates new product and service ideas and makes a first go/no-go decision under high levels of uncertainty and ambiguity. Paying more attention to the decision-making process in the screening stage appears important because too rigorous a use of rigid evaluation criteria and inflexible methods have been shown to have an adverse effect on market performance of novel products. The present study proposes and tests a model of team-level antecedents and consequences of reflexivity-the explicit evaluation and discussion of working methods, tools, and criteria within a team. Recently, researchers have proposed that cognitive style and leadership style are major antecedents of decision-making performance. This study posits that reflexivity offers an explanation of how transformational leadership and cognitive style can eventually affect decision-making performance in the context of new product idea screening. Results of a survey among 126 top managers from large international firms show that the positive effects of transformational leadership and procedural rationality on the effectiveness and efficiency of screening decision making are largely mediated by reflexivity at the team level. This suggests that screening teams can improve their decision making in the following ways: committee chairs are advised to stimulate openness, develop a stop-and-think attitude among screening committee members, and support argument-based discussion in order to adapt available decision tools, models, and checklists whenever needed. The paper concludes with implications, limitations of the study, and suggestions for further research.

Adopting Design Thinking in Novice Multidisciplinary Teams: The Application and Limits of Design Methods and Reflexive Practices

“…They note the challenge of working with the construct and note that “a possible conclusion … is that group task reflexivity can have performance benefits, but only under very special conditions. …” It may be that mixed results in past studies can be explained in part by temporal dependence and that team reflexivity may be unique to a specific timeframe, such as found within early screening decisions (Hammedi, van Riel, and Sasovova, ). Our work specifically looked across concept generation and concept selection, and this may have helped us to identify the contingent nature of reflexive action.…”

From Preliminary Ideas to Corroborated Product Definitions: Managing the Front End of New Product Development

“…77 Screening committees should be composed of individuals who can openly discuss ideas and concepts, because an open climate favoring risk taking, trust, and interaction positively influences front-end activities. 78 I/C screening can be conducted within formal as well as informal settings, by both internal and external actors. For example, innovation intermediaries can be helpful in performing screening tasks.…”

Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing

“…First, they offer scalable approaches for addressing organizations' ongoing and expanding strategic identification of promising emerging opportunities (Chen et al 2009). Scalable IT-based systems provide alternatives to costly expert panel evaluations, i.e., today's default mechanism for evaluation of early stage ideas (Hammedi 2011, Ozer 2005. Second, such effective IT-based mechanisms promise to improve the quality of idea evaluation by integrating diverse viewpoints and aggregating dispersed knowledge (e.g., Arrow et al 2008, Riedl et al 2013.…”