2013
DOI: 10.1108/intr-09-2012-0175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedent of purchase intention: online seller reputation, product category and surcharge

Abstract: Purpose -This paper aims to examine the antecedent of purchase intention: online seller reputation, product category and surcharge. Design/methodology/approach -This paper uses five experimental designs to explore the seller reputation, product category and surcharge effects in Internet shopping. The authors chose one seller of low reputation and one seller of high reputation from Yahoo Mall. ANOVA are used to evaluate the results. Findings -Sellers of high reputation can post higher surcharges to increase the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…significantly impact the consumer purchase intention. For example, Pan, Kuo, Pan, and Tu (2013) discussed the impact of online sellers' reputation and product categories on the consumer purchase intention. Wang and Chang (2013) demonstrated that for high-risk products, the information and recommendations provided by strong-tie contacts have a greater effect on purchase intention than those provided by weak-tie contacts.…”
Section: Literature Review On Social Commercementioning
confidence: 99%
“…significantly impact the consumer purchase intention. For example, Pan, Kuo, Pan, and Tu (2013) discussed the impact of online sellers' reputation and product categories on the consumer purchase intention. Wang and Chang (2013) demonstrated that for high-risk products, the information and recommendations provided by strong-tie contacts have a greater effect on purchase intention than those provided by weak-tie contacts.…”
Section: Literature Review On Social Commercementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, deemed it necessary to control the price of the products corrected. A higher price is generally considered as an indication of good quality, even though this perception may vary across product categories (Pan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Controlled Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper started from the research gap relating to the effect of product innovation to consumer purchase intention, in which there are studies found a significant effect of product innovation on consumer purchase intention, while other studies found no significant effect of product innovation on consumer purchase intention. The results of this study found that product innovation has significant positive effect on consumer purchase intention, in which it provided strong supports for Tung (2012) [44], Hung et al (2011) [21] and Moon et al (2008) [27] that product innovation is reflected in product differentiation and adding attributes of the product is important information for consumer in purchase process.It was found that the community-based peripherals attribute attractiveness has a positive and significant effect to consumer purchase intention, which is gave strong supports to concepts developed by Eckman and Wagner (1994) [10], Sashi and Stern (1995) [37], Huber, Hermann, and Morgan (2001) [20], and Pan, Kuo, Pan, and Tu (2012) [31]on the role of product characteristics are reflected in the product attributes as a result of the introduction and clear differentiation between the company's product and competitor's product so it is easy for the consumer purchase decision.The results also indicated that the advantage of the product attributes gave positive and significant effect to consumer purchase intention, so it gave strong support to the results of research conducted by Rogers (1983) [35], Holak and Lehmann (1990) [19], Xu (2009 ) [45] and Chen (2010) [5] who found the positive effect of attractiveness of product advantage, functional attractiveness, symbolic…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%