1990
DOI: 10.2307/3760044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonistic Activity of Pseudohalonectria and Ophioceras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, woody substrates colonized by P. lignicola had no other fungi recorded (Tsui, unpublished data). This finding may support the inhibitory and competitive activities of P. lignicola reported in other investigations (Asthana and Shearer 1990;Yuen et al 1999b). Pseudohalonectria spp., particularly P. lignicola, are inhibitory to other freshwater fungi (Asthana and Shearer 1990), with good evidence from both cultural and field competition studies (Asthana and Shearer 1990).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, woody substrates colonized by P. lignicola had no other fungi recorded (Tsui, unpublished data). This finding may support the inhibitory and competitive activities of P. lignicola reported in other investigations (Asthana and Shearer 1990;Yuen et al 1999b). Pseudohalonectria spp., particularly P. lignicola, are inhibitory to other freshwater fungi (Asthana and Shearer 1990), with good evidence from both cultural and field competition studies (Asthana and Shearer 1990).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This finding may support the inhibitory and competitive activities of P. lignicola reported in other investigations (Asthana and Shearer 1990;Yuen et al 1999b). Pseudohalonectria spp., particularly P. lignicola, are inhibitory to other freshwater fungi (Asthana and Shearer 1990), with good evidence from both cultural and field competition studies (Asthana and Shearer 1990). In addition, species of Chaetosphaeria, Pseudohalonectria, and Ophioceras were found to be competitive in defending the colonized substrata against invading species when precolonized wood blocks were submerged in a river for 3 months and then retrieved (Fryar et al 2001).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The measurement of colony growth was stopped when the edges of the Petri dish were reached by the mycelium or, in the case of slow-growing fungi, 17 days after inoculation. The fungal growth rate was classified as slow (0–1 mm d -1 ), moderate (1–3 mm d -1 ) or fast (3–6 mm d -1 ) [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second quantitative measure was the percentage of resistance; this percentage represented the overall ability of a given species to grow and to resist the presence of other fungi. It was determined by adding the growth percentages of a given species in all dual assays with other fungal species and comparing the resulting percentage to its growth in isolation [ 30 ]. The resistance percentages were determined as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungal growth (area) was determined through image analysis using the software IMAGEJ 1.52a [29]. The quantitative assessment of interactions was scored by calculating the Percent Inhibition Index (PII, Equation (1)) [30], and the Overall Antagonism Index (OAI or resistance estimate, Equation (2)) [31]. The PII denotes growth differences in mono-cultures in relation to co-cultures, whereas the OAI represents the overall ability of a given species to grow and to resist the presence of other fungi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%