2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another look at measures of forecast accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,912
0
51

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,787 publications
(2,174 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
1,912
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…As percentage measures such as the MAPE and the MDPV are heavily skewed when the series have values close to zero (see e.g. Hyndman and Koehler (2006); this is also confirmed in unreported preliminary experiments), for each series we subtract the overall minimum (calculated over all series) from all values to obtain a series of non-negative values, and then we increment all values by 1, to achieve a series which only contains values greater 1. In this way, new coefficients are estimated and a new series is generated for each iteration.…”
Section: Univariate Casementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As percentage measures such as the MAPE and the MDPV are heavily skewed when the series have values close to zero (see e.g. Hyndman and Koehler (2006); this is also confirmed in unreported preliminary experiments), for each series we subtract the overall minimum (calculated over all series) from all values to obtain a series of non-negative values, and then we increment all values by 1, to achieve a series which only contains values greater 1. In this way, new coefficients are estimated and a new series is generated for each iteration.…”
Section: Univariate Casementioning
confidence: 68%
“…This paper aims to investigate the usefulness of a blocked cross-validation (BCV) scheme along with directional accuracy measures for forecast evaluation. Several forecast error measures such as scale-dependent, percentage and relative measures have been used largely for forecast evaluation (see Hyndman and Koehler (2006); Costantini and Pappalardo (2010), Costantini and Kunst (2011) among others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecasts are evaluated using the Relative Mean Absolute Error (RMAE) (see Davydenko and Fildes, 2013) and the Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) (see Hyndman and Koehler, 2006). Both these measures permit calculating forecasting accuracy across time series of different scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAPE is commonly used to evaluate cross-sectional forecasts [54]. MAPE values for the main variables of the model are shown in table 4.6.…”
Section: Model Validation and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%