1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51807-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anorectal Manometry Results in Defecation Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Constipation accounts for 3% of visits to a general pediatrician's office and 25% of visits to a pediatric gastroenterologist (6). Ninety-five percent of children with chronic constipation have functional constipation, and only %5% have an organic cause for their symptoms (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constipation accounts for 3% of visits to a general pediatrician's office and 25% of visits to a pediatric gastroenterologist (6). Ninety-five percent of children with chronic constipation have functional constipation, and only %5% have an organic cause for their symptoms (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,18 It should be emphasized that in those studies rectal sensitivity was assessed using volume-controlled distention. Our choice of the barostat was confirmed when we determined the volume in the barostat balloon at the pressure threshold of urge to defecate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In contrast, abnormal rectal sensitivity has been reported in 27% to 78% of children with PC. 8,9 In these studies, sensitivity was tested by distending the rectum with increasing volumes (ie, anorectal manometry). To date, it is known that pressure/tension, not volume, mainly determines visceral perception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the clinical importance of impaired peripheral sensations in children has been questioned [30]. Although earlier studies reported that larger rectal distension volumes were needed to trigger rectal sensation in constipated children [227,228], more recent studies found no difference in sensory function in children with functional constipation when compared to healthy volunteers [229,230], although rectal compliance (stretch response to an imposed force) was greater (i.e. the rectum was more lax) in constipated individuals.…”
Section: Rectal Sensorimotor Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%