2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9317(03)00308-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous temperature dependence of the conductivity of nanoporous ITO films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the device with TiO 2 nanotubes arrays heated up to 500 • C had better crystallization and resulted in higher current density. Further increase in the annealing temperature would have been a disadvantage as the conductivity of ITO decreases [16]. In addition the phase transformation from anatase to rutile could take place at high temperature [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the device with TiO 2 nanotubes arrays heated up to 500 • C had better crystallization and resulted in higher current density. Further increase in the annealing temperature would have been a disadvantage as the conductivity of ITO decreases [16]. In addition the phase transformation from anatase to rutile could take place at high temperature [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas G does not increase until 400 K during the heating, it decreases steadily during cooling down to 300 K; at the same temperature from 300 to 580 K, G is higher during the cooling than the heating, and, after the heating and cooling cycle, G returns to a higher value than its initial value. Such differences and hysteresis strongly suggest irreversible changes during the cycle, as is the case in SnO 2 thin films [1,2,14,15]. To look into the mechanism that controls the behaviors shown in figure 3(b), ln G is plotted against 1/ T in figure 4(a), where the hysteresis between 300 and 570 K is more obvious.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S stands for surface [6][7][8][9]. Note that moisture and oxygen have opposite effects on G and their adsorption and desorption dynamics are different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G vs T hystersis is actually due to the partial replacing of adsorbed oxygen by moisture on SnO 2 surface after the heating and cooling cycle. Such irreversible replacement can be attributed to the numerous pores within the ribbon, whose capillary effects additionally restrict adsorption, desorption, diffusion and evaporation [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%