Neutron scattering reveals a complex dynamics in polypeptide chains, with two main onsets of anharmonicity whose physical origin and biological role are still debated. In this study the dynamics of strategically selected homomeric polypeptides is investigated with elastic neutron scattering using different energy resolutions and compared with that of a real protein. Our data spotlight the dependence of anharmonic transition temperatures and fluctuation amplitudes on energy resolution, which we quantitatively explain in terms of a two-site model for the protein-hydration water energy landscape. Experimental data strongly suggest that the protein dynamical transition is not a mere resolution effect but is due to a real physical effect. Activation barriers and free energy values obtained for the protein dynamical transition allow us to make a connection with the two-well interaction potential of supercooledconfined water proposed to explain a low-density ! high-density liquid-liquid transition. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128102 PACS numbers: 87.14.ef, 83.85.Hf, 87.15.HÀ Neutron scattering is a powerful technique to study protein dynamics and energetics. The structure factor SðE ¼ 0; Q; TÞ of elastic incoherent neutron scattering (EINS) is related to the time-position self correlation function of protein-solvent nuclei that, in turn, is related to the energy landscape of the system whose different tiers can be explored by the temperature dependence of the EINS signal. In particular, EINS on D 2 O-hydrated protein powders, which probes the mean square displacements (MSDs) of protein nonexchangeable H atoms, reveals two deviations from harmonic dynamics, at $100-150 K and at $220 K [1,2]. Molecular origin, physical nature and biological relevance of these ''transitions'' are still matter of discussion. The first one is attributed mainly to thermally activated motions of CH 3 methyl groups [1,[3][4][5][6] (for this reason hereon called methyl groups activation, MGA). The second one, called ''protein dynamical transition'' (PDT), has been first interpreted as a glasslike transition [2] directly correlated to the onset of biological activity [7], but this view has been later challenged. Several interpretations of the PDT have been proposed: (i) a change in the protein structural flexibility in response to the glass transition of hydration water [8]; (ii) a result of the protein structural relaxation reaching the limit of the experimental frequency window [9][10][11]; (iii) the protein response to a fragile-to-strong dynamic crossover in the hydration water at 220 K where water structure makes a low density liquid ðLDLÞ ! high density liquid (HDL) transition [12]; (iv) a change in the thermodynamic resilience of the waterprotein system [13]. These models propose physical pictures partially alternative, demonstrating that the question has not been definitively settled yet: (i) and (ii) ascribe the PDT to a temperature dependent relaxation time crossing the instrumental time-scale; (iii) and (iv) interpret the PDT as ...