2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.212403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous magnetization reversal due to proximity effect of antiphase boundaries

Abstract: Here we report anomalous double switching hysteresis loop and high coercivity (∼0.1 T) in Fe 3 O 4 (110) thin films. Our analytical model based on spin chains confined within small antiphase boundary domains (APBDs) suggests a significant proximity effect of antiferromagnetic antiphase boundaries (APBs). Furthermore, the calculated domain size (D) follows the well-known scaling relation D = C √ t. The results suggest that the interface exchange coupling between neighboring magnetic domains through antiferromag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6a. The presence of a double step in the M(H) loops of thin films of spinel oxides262728293031 and other ferrimagnetic oxide as ε-Fe 2 O 3 32 as well as ceramic samples33 is a common experimental observation. The saturation magnetization M s , about 250 emu/cm 3 at 10 K, is lower than in bulk CFO as usually observed in CFO films deposited on perovskite oxide surfaces26272830.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a. The presence of a double step in the M(H) loops of thin films of spinel oxides262728293031 and other ferrimagnetic oxide as ε-Fe 2 O 3 32 as well as ceramic samples33 is a common experimental observation. The saturation magnetization M s , about 250 emu/cm 3 at 10 K, is lower than in bulk CFO as usually observed in CFO films deposited on perovskite oxide surfaces26272830.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was pointed out in ref. 37 . the antiphase boundaries in iron oxides may account for the soft magnetic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step-like features in the M (H) loops observed in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f) are mainly due to the proximity effect of anti-phase boundaries. 41 Similarly, considering the second case when the nucleation starts at the A-sites, there are 64 possible combinations, but only 8 combinations do not result in the formation of APBs. Therefore, there is a high chance of forming APBs along the step edges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%