1993
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(93)90209-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annular dark-field imaging: Resolution and thickness effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The background signal is generated from the average scattering from the material sampled by the de-channelled probe and, therefore, gives non-local information about the specimen. Hence, in order to associate the change in the column intensity ratio with the change in local composition, the underlying background signal must be removed before the column ratio is measured [18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, it is not a straight forward matter to separate the background signal from the high-resolution column intensities especially across interfaces where the background changes in value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The background signal is generated from the average scattering from the material sampled by the de-channelled probe and, therefore, gives non-local information about the specimen. Hence, in order to associate the change in the column intensity ratio with the change in local composition, the underlying background signal must be removed before the column ratio is measured [18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, it is not a straight forward matter to separate the background signal from the high-resolution column intensities especially across interfaces where the background changes in value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the structure and composition of the atomic columns of the specimen also influence the column ratio as does the specimen thickness [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Hence, it is not always possible to definitively state the Group III column composition from a single value of the column ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HAADF image contrast is also affected by the sample's thickness due to the longitudinal coherence difference along the atomic columns, the probe channeling effect and probe intensity transfer between atomic columns [41][42][43][44][45][46]. As shown in figure S1 (available at stacks.iop.org/Nano/23/ 335706/mmedia), the surfaces of rutile twins are faceted, the thickness along the twin boundary equals the projection of the diamond shape of (011) facets, the thickness along the twin boundary first increases and then decreases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High angle annular dark field (HAADF) STEM imaging is typically employed to give atomic number (Z) contrast images due to the collection of Rutherford-like scattering Jesson, 1991, 1990). In a qualitative model of HAADF image contrast, high-spatial resolution information is given by atomic column intensities that are associated with probe channelling (Dwyer and Etheridge, 2003;Hillyard et al, 1993;Rossouw, 2003). In comparison, the underlying background signal is generated by the average scattering from the de-channelled probe and therefore provides non-local information about the specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%