2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2213-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications

Abstract: BackgroundLumbar intervertebral disc herniation is a common cause of lower back and leg pain, with surgical intervention (e.g. discectomy to remove the herniated disc) recommended after an appropriate period of conservative management, however the existing or increased breach of the annulus fibrosus persists with the potential of reherniation. Several prosthesis and techniques to reduce re-herniation have been proposed including implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) – Barricaid™ and an annular tissue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regards to this case, postoperative objective accelerometer measurements demonstrated improvements of 60% in distance walked per day, number of steps taken and GV at 1-month follow-up, compared to preoperative measures. The sudden drop in functional status at day 57 was prominent, thus verifying the value of objective measurements with assistance in identifying the postoperative complication, such as recurrent disc herniation, a common yet undesirable outcome of microdiscectomy (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With regards to this case, postoperative objective accelerometer measurements demonstrated improvements of 60% in distance walked per day, number of steps taken and GV at 1-month follow-up, compared to preoperative measures. The sudden drop in functional status at day 57 was prominent, thus verifying the value of objective measurements with assistance in identifying the postoperative complication, such as recurrent disc herniation, a common yet undesirable outcome of microdiscectomy (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These annular closure devices (ACDs) have been the subject of pre-clinical and early clinical studies [15,22,42], with the early evidence providing some evidence in support of their use. A recent meta-analysis performed [43] of four clinical studies [42,[44][45][46] investigating two current ACD technologies cited similar positive results from both devices, although the relatively limited clinical data prevented the authors from drawing firm conclusions on the overall effectiveness of these devices. Another recent randomized, controlled trial comparing lumbar discectomy plus bone-anchored annular closure with lumbar discectomy alone showed a significant improvement in all outcomes, including the rates of recurrent herniation (50% vs. 70%, p < 0.001), symptomatic reherniation (18% vs. 27%, p = 0.02) and reoperation (12% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 The study, reported in the these reports also highlighted that device implantation led to higher prevalence of endplate changes. [82][83][84][85] The long-term efficacy and safety of the device, especially concerning the damage of the vertebral bone and endplate during device fixation, remains to be determined.…”
Section: Injury Manifestations Diagnosis and Patient Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%