1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb02976.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual variation in energy reserves in male three‐spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatm L. (Pisces, Gasterosteidae)

Abstract: Wet and dry weights of tissue were measured and concentrations of glycogen, lipid and protein were estimated for the liver, gonad and carcass of male sticklebacks from an annual population collected each month over one complete year. In young-of-the-year there is one period of rapid weight gain, in all three body regions (liver, carcass and gonads) but particularly of the carcass, in the autumn and a second in spring and early summer. This is accompanied by an increase in the water content of all three body re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are consistent with previous reports of the age structure (Mann, 1971;Allen and Wootton, 1982;O'Hara and Penczak, 1987;Wootton and Smith, 2000;Poizat et al, 2002;Wootton, 2007) and sex ratio (Kynard, 1978;Wootton, 1984;Mori, 1993;Arnold et al, 2003) of three-spined stickleback populations. Disproportionate mortality among males due to the energetic demands and risks associated with male parental investment has been suggested to account for the female bias (Chellappa et al, 1989;Arnold et al, 2003).…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are consistent with previous reports of the age structure (Mann, 1971;Allen and Wootton, 1982;O'Hara and Penczak, 1987;Wootton and Smith, 2000;Poizat et al, 2002;Wootton, 2007) and sex ratio (Kynard, 1978;Wootton, 1984;Mori, 1993;Arnold et al, 2003) of three-spined stickleback populations. Disproportionate mortality among males due to the energetic demands and risks associated with male parental investment has been suggested to account for the female bias (Chellappa et al, 1989;Arnold et al, 2003).…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males build a nest in which a female will deposit all her eggs, and all subsequent parental care (including intensive fanning of the eggs and guarding of the nest and fry) is by the male. Both sexes might participate in several breeding attempts within a single breeding season, but reproduction is costly, and in annual populations most fish senesce and die before the end of the season (Chellappa et al 1989;Poizat et al 1999). Reproductive effort in each breeding attempt is influenced by this short-life expectancy, with individuals of both sexes investing more in reproduction as future reproductive opportunities decline (Candolin 1998;Poizat et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproductive effort in each breeding attempt is influenced by this short-life expectancy, with individuals of both sexes investing more in reproduction as future reproductive opportunities decline (Candolin 1998;Poizat et al 1999). For males in particular, reproductive activities are energetically expensive (Chellappa et al 1989;Fitzgerald et al 1989) and males in poor condition may die during the parental phase and thus fail to rear the offspring to independence or they may eat the eggs in their nest in order to improve their physical condition ( Whoriskey & FitzGerald 1994). Given this breeding system and the rapid rate of senescence, there should be selection pressure on females to choose males who are capable of remaining alive and healthy for the duration of parental care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For males that care and guard the eggs, one of the likely features of male reproductive investment is a reduction of feeding opportunities during the breeding season (e.g. Qasim, 1957;Miller, 1984;Sargent & Gross, 1986;Santos & Almada, 1988;Chellappa et al, 1989;Almada et al, 1992;Santos, 1992;Smith & Wootton, 1995;Santos et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%