2011
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/63.3.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual Parallax Measurements of an Infrared Dark Cloud, MSXDC G034.43+00.24 with VERA

Abstract: We have measured the annual parallax of the H 2 O maser source associated with an infrared dark cloud MSXDC G034.43+00.24 from the observations with VERA (VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry). The parallax is 0.643 ± 0.049 mas, corresponding to the distance of 1.56 +0.12 −0.11 kpc. This value is less than the half of the previous kinematic distance of 3.7 kpc. We revise the core mass estimates of MSXDC G034.43+00.24, based on virial masses, LTE masses and dust masses and show that the core masses decrease fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
58
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Column 8 gives the kinematic distance of the cloud from Simon et al (2006). While Kurayama et al (2011) find a 1.56 kpc distance for IRDC F, containing F1 and F2, Foster et al (2012) find a distance consistent with the kinematic distance for IRDC F, based upon extinction measurements. We thus elect to use the kinematic distances from Simon et al (2006) for all four clumps in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Column 8 gives the kinematic distance of the cloud from Simon et al (2006). While Kurayama et al (2011) find a 1.56 kpc distance for IRDC F, containing F1 and F2, Foster et al (2012) find a distance consistent with the kinematic distance for IRDC F, based upon extinction measurements. We thus elect to use the kinematic distances from Simon et al (2006) for all four clumps in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Column 10 gives the kinematic distance of the cloud from Simon et al (2006). While Kurayama et al (2011) find a 1.56 kpc distance for IRDC F, containing F1 and F2, Foster et al (2012) find a distance consistent with the kinematic distance for IRDC F, based upon extinction measurements. We thus elect to use the kinematic distances from Simon et al (2006) for both IRDCs in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We acknowledge, however, that the error in the kinematic distance can be larger due to randomly oriented peculiar motions of up to 20 or 30 km s −1 with respect to Galactic rotation, as shown, e.g., by the hydrodynamical simulations by Baba et al (2009). Similarly, such large systematic velocities have been found from maser parallax observations, leading to up to a factor 2 wrong kinematic distances (e.g., Xu et al 2006;Kurayama et al 2011). However, in some such cases it has been found also that the star-forming region does follow circular rotation (e.g., Sato et al 2010).…”
Section: B43 Derivation Of the Kinematic Distancesmentioning
confidence: 72%