2020
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abc7dd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual and seasonal mean tropical and subtropical precipitation bias in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our CESM1 results are consistent with our suggested mechanism of a radiation‐driven dynamical response to falling ice radiative effects, which counteract several known biases across the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles. They are too‐high SST biases, TOA and surface radiation biases (Li et al., 2013, 2015; Li, Lee, et al., 2014; Li, Xu, Jiang, et al., 2020; Li, Xu, Richardson, et al., 2020), and biases in trade‐wind large‐scale environments discussed in the present study. The results suggest a potential cause of overestimated middle‐ and high‐level clouds reported in CMIP5 models (e.g., Nam et al., 2012) via changes in trade‐wind large‐scale environments resulting from hydrometeors‐radiation‐circulation interactions.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, our CESM1 results are consistent with our suggested mechanism of a radiation‐driven dynamical response to falling ice radiative effects, which counteract several known biases across the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles. They are too‐high SST biases, TOA and surface radiation biases (Li et al., 2013, 2015; Li, Lee, et al., 2014; Li, Xu, Jiang, et al., 2020; Li, Xu, Richardson, et al., 2020), and biases in trade‐wind large‐scale environments discussed in the present study. The results suggest a potential cause of overestimated middle‐ and high‐level clouds reported in CMIP5 models (e.g., Nam et al., 2012) via changes in trade‐wind large‐scale environments resulting from hydrometeors‐radiation‐circulation interactions.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The improvements have been made in its newer version CESM2‐CAM6 participating in CMIP6, which includes prognostic FIREs and other important upgrades in cloud‐related physical parameterizations compared to CESM1‐CAM5. For example, CESM2‐CAM6 has improved tropical hydrometeor‐radiation interactions (Li, Xu, Jiang, et al., 2020) and precipitation simulation (Li, Xu, Richardson, et al., 2020; Woelfle et al., 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two studies [24,25] reported that GCMs' capacity to capture local or regional climate patterns, which are relevant to ensure sound management decisions and mitigation strategies, is weak, especially for precipitation events [26]. Despite the use of a regional model in this study, we decided to incorporate bias correction to increase the validity of the presented results.…”
Section: Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%