Annotated Bibliography on the Teaching of Psychology: 1984

Abstract

This bibliography continues those shown in the references below, listed in chronological order. Search methods, criteria for inclusion, and other considerations are similar t o those used previously. T h e numbering of items is cumulative. We have included a few pre-1984 items that were not listed in previous bibliographies. Johnson, M., & Daniel, R. S. (1972). Comprehensive annotated bibliography on the teaching of psychology at the undergraduate level through 1972. . Using a personalized system of instruction to improve the writing skills of undergraduates. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 95-98. Comparing first to last papers, significant improvement was found in 12 of 18 criteria of student writing style and clarity. . Faculty andPhD candidates suggest a system and a rationale for this high-anxiety step for which there are few published guidelines. REFERENCES

18: The Teaching Resource Portfolio: A Tool Kit for Future Professoriate and a Resource Guide for Current Teachers

“…For instance, 29 annotated bibliographies have been identified in the social sciences. Of these, most are annual updated reports of teaching resources in psychology building on previous annotations, not independent reports (e.g., Berry & Daniel, 1985;Dagenbach, 1999;Daniel, 1981;Fulkerson &Wise, 1995;Johnson, Schroder, & Kirkbride, 2005;Morgan & Daniel, 1983;Mosley & Daniel, 1982;Wise &Fulkerson, 1996). Four of these support teaching sociology (e.g., Goldsmid & Goldsmid, 1982;Lindstrom, 1998;South, '1989) and three, teaching history (Barbuto & Kreisel, 1994;Brazier, 1985;Popp, 1996).…”

18: The Teaching Resource Portfolio: A Tool Kit for Future Professoriate and a Resource Guide for Current Teachers

“…For instance, 29 annotated bibliographies have been identified in the social sciences. Of these, most are annual updated reports of teaching resources in psychology building on previous annotations, not independent reports (e.g., Berry & Daniel, 1985;Dagenbach, 1999;Daniel, 1981;Fulkerson &Wise, 1995;Johnson, Schroder, & Kirkbride, 2005;Morgan & Daniel, 1983;Mosley & Daniel, 1982;Wise &Fulkerson, 1996). Four of these support teaching sociology (e.g.,…”